Gruetze: Pa. will deal online poker in 2017, financial analysis says |

Gruetze: Pa. will deal online poker in 2017, financial analysis says


Pennsylvania poker players could be posting blinds online in 2017, says a new analysis of Internet gambling expansion.

Saying backers made “significant progress” this year, a study released Sept. 10 by Morgan Stanley Research predicts the Legislature will approve a poker-only bill in 2016, and cards will fly across screens the following year.

The investment company analysis predicts Pennsylvania’s online-poker market will be $58 million in its first year and grow to $389.5 million in the fourth year. The latter estimate assumes the Legislature approves other online games after two years of only poker.

California, New York and Illinois are the other states likely to approve some form of online gambling by 2016, Morgan Stanley says.

It pegs California as the first to act, approving a poker-only law in 2015 and launching games in 2016. The online market is expected to total $260 million. California’s adult population is 29 million, about three times more than Pennsylvania’s, and Californians are more likely to gamble online. The study forecasts that 19 percent of California adults will play online, compared with 11.3 percent of Pennsylvanians.

John Pappas, executive director of Poker Players Alliance, which supports legalization of online poker, says a Pennsylvania bill could pick up speed next year.

“I don’t think there is any chance of a bill this year, but, yes, 2015 is a good probability,” he says. “It takes a couple legislative cycles, at a minimum, to get something done. I fully expect more bills to be introduced in 2015, along with hearings and even votes.”

The Morgan Stanley study estimates the national online-gambling market will total $1.3 billion in seven states in 2017 and reach $5.2 billion in 2020, when it will be available in 20 states, including West Virginia and Ohio.

Those totals are down from previous company estimates, based on technical problems and below-expectation performance in the first states with online betting. One problem is that some credit-card companies and banks have been reluctant to approve online casino transactions.

Only three states — Nevada, New Jersey and Delaware — currently allow Internet gambling. Federal law requires gamblers to be in the state to play. Nevada, where online gambling is limited to poker, and Delaware have agreed to allow players from each state to compete against each other. New Jersey reportedly is considering a similar pact.

New Jersey casinos, which offer slots, table games and poker online, have won $92 million from Internet gambling since the games began in November 2013.

A bill to allow online poker in Pennsylvania remains in committee, says Tom Golden, aide to Sen. Edwin Erickson, R-Chester County, the bill’s sponsor. Gordon does not expect action before the November election.

A state-commissioned study released in March said Pennsylvania could reap $113 million a year from full-fledged online gambling. With the state’s budget problems, a revenue source that wouldn’t involve directly taxing residents could appeal to lawmakers. However, ardent online-gambling opponent Sheldon Adelson is CEO of the company that owns the Sands in Bethlehem, one of the state’s most profitable casinos.

Morgan Stanley says the national online-poker market could grow quickly if PokerStars is allowed to set up operations in New Jersey. PokerStars is the world’s largest online-poker site but could not get licensed in Nevada or New Jersey after being accused in 2011 of violating U.S. banking laws. Amaya Gaming Group of Canada bought PokerStars in August, and Morgan Stanley says New Jersey could approve a PokerStars site this year.

The study notes that after PokerStars became available in Italy in 2009, the country’s online poker market grew by 62 percent in a year. PokerStars accounted for more than half of that.

“We remain bullish on the long-term opportunity for U.S. online gaming,” Morgan Stanley says.

Mark Gruetze is administrative editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7838 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.