ShareThis Page
Guido: Kiski Area celebrates golden anniversary |

Guido: Kiski Area celebrates golden anniversary

| Wednesday, September 26, 2012 12:36 a.m
Valley News Dispatch
An aerial shot of Kiski Area High School on Aug. 15, 1962, several weeks before the school opened. Kiski Area will celebrate its 50th anniversary Oct. 4-6, 2012. VND file photo

It’s hard to believe Kiski Area High School has turned 50.It seems like just yesterday when Vandergrift and Bell-Avon high schools consolidated. Kiski Area became even bigger in 1966 when the former Washington Township High school joined the fold.

To commemorate the golden anniversary, Kiski Area has an array of events scheduled for the weekend of Oct. 5-6.

• Oct. 4: A 50th anniversary Homecoming bonfire and pep rally at 7 p.m. at the high school.

• Oct. 5: Spirit Day in all school district buildings with pep rallies. Everyone is urged to wear Kiski Area colors.

• Oct. 5: Homecoming parade from Vandergrift Elementary School through downtown Vandergrift to Davis Field at 6:30 p.m. Many of the past homecoming queens will be introduced.

• Oct. 5: Football game against long-time rival Norwin at 7:30 p.m. Norwin is a fitting opponent since the rivalry dates to 1962 in the old Foothills Conference. Kiski Area has an all-time record of 19-7 vs. the Knights.

• Oct. 6: A 5K run through downtown Vandergrift at 9 a.m.

• Oct. 6: High school open house from 10 a.m. to noon. How disappointed will the alumni be when they find out the infamous Kiski Area tunnel no longer exists?

• Oct. 6: Gala dinner at 7 p.m. at the Clarion Hotel, New Kensington. For tickets, go to At the same time, students will have their homecoming dance at the old high school gym.

The school district started in 1958 when each municipality had its own school district. Each borough and township was asked to send people to serve on a joint school board. The 48-member joint board was winnowed down to the current format of a nine-member board.

Gateway-Altoonameet again

Gateway and Altoona met last Friday night with the Gators posting a 42-7 victory.

The Gators (4-0, 4-0) are No. 2 in this week’s Trib Total Media Class AAAA poll.

On Nov. 22, 1969, the schools met for the WPIAL title at Pitt Stadium, with Gateway winning, 22-15.

While last Friday’s encounter may have been a key Quad East Conference game, it did not have the sociological impact of the 1969 game.

Until that 1969 Gateway victory, there was a belief around the WPIAL that a team from one of the post-World War II boom suburbs, such as Monroeville, couldn’t win a championship.

Up until then, students from places such as Gateway, North Allegheny, Thomas Jefferson and Upper St. Clair were thought of as soft and spoiled with the suburban lifestyles — lacking the toughness of kids from the industrial, riverfront towns.

But Gateway and coach Pete Antimarino had other thoughts.

Mark Campbell, whose son played for Franklin Regional, had 80 yards rushing and Mike Devine added 74 yards on the ground. Quarterback Rich Hrenka was 4 for 4 passing, all to Dave Jagdmann.

Dave Bechtold intercepted a pass late in the game to preserve the Gateway victory.

Altoona had just rejoined the WPIAL in 1969 after a 25-year absence, and 1969 proved to be a watershed year in that community.

Long a railroading town, Altoona experienced an economic decline after the Penn Central Railroad declared bankruptcy in September 1969.

George Guido is a Valley News Dispatch scholastic sports correspondent. His column appears Wednesdays.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.