ShareThis Page
Gun-sale records are sticking point |

Gun-sale records are sticking point

The Associated Press
| Sunday, February 24, 2013 9:54 p.m

WASHINGTON — A dispute over whether to require record keeping for private gun sales is holding up a compromise between Republican and Democratic senators over expanding background checks for firearms transactions, one of President Obama’s top gun control priorities, those familiar with the talks said on Sunday.

Two GOP and two Democratic senators have been looking for a compromise on requiring more of the checks, which are mandatory only for transactions by federally licensed dealers. Private transactions at gun shows, online and elsewhere are not covered. Proponents say that the system is designed to keep firearms from criminals and those with serious mental problems.

The senators have been bargaining quietly over ways to expand the checks to private sales. But Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., a conservative who has taken a leading role in the talks, opposes record keeping for private transactions because of a concern it could lead to a national registry of gun owners. The National Rifle Association is against such a registry.

Democrats said keeping records of private sales is the only way to ensure the checks are performed, and insist that fears are unfounded. They have offered to have gun manufacturers or other private entities, not the government, keep those records.

The talks were described by a Senate aide and a lobbyist who spoke on condition of anonymity because the senators’ talks are private and considered extremely politically sensitive.

Other senators participating in the bargaining are liberal Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., moderate Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., and moderate Mark Kirk, R-Ill.

An agreement involving the influential Coburn could be pivotal because it could pave the way for other Republicans to support a background check bill. Coburn said on Sunday that he opposed keeping records on “legitimate, law-abiding gun owners.”

“All they have to do is create a record keeping and that will kill this bill,” he said on “Fox News Sunday.”

The bargainers are close to agreement on other parts of the background check compromise, including carving out exemptions for sales between close relatives and for people who had been cleared to receive concealed-carry permits. They are working toward establishing an appeals process for veterans initially denied guns because they were treated for post-traumatic stress disorder.

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee is hoping his panel can begin writing gun control legislation this week, but it could well happen next week.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.