ShareThis Page
Gunfire probed in NK, Arnold |

Gunfire probed in NK, Arnold

The Valley News Dispatch
| Sunday, September 1, 2002 12:00 a.m

NEW KENSINGTON: Police are unclear if there is a connection between the wounding of a man Saturday in New Kensington and two reports of shots being fired later in the day in New Kensington and Arnold.

Police said Keith Whitmer, 20, no address given, was hit by gunfire about 1 a.m. in the 400 block of 10th Street in New Ken-sington.

Police Sgt. Robert Laporte said someone took Whitmer to the Alle-Kiski Medical Center, New Kensington (formerly Citizens General Hospital) at about 1:14 a.m. The urgi-care center had closed at 11 p.m., so he was taken by ambulance to an unnamed hospital, police said.

Laporte said detectives are investigating.

“There is an unknown assailant or assailants and the circumstance is unknown,” he said.

Laporte said it’s also unclear if the wounding is related to a report of shots fired later Saturday.

At mid-afternoon shift change, an officer heard shots along Third Avenue in New Kensington, Laporte said. Police couldn’t find any evidence, but later said a 28-year-old black man went to the police station to file a report that someone had shot at him.

The unidentified man was unharmed. Once again, police couldn’t find shell casings or bullet damage.

Then, at about 6 p.m., Arnold and New Kensington officers rushed to Third Avenue in Arnold for another report of shots.

Laporte and Arnold Sgt. Eric Doutt said police couldn’t find evidence although a crowd had gathered at the scene.

“There were about 30 people on the street. No one saw anything,” Laporte said.

Everyone said they hadn’t seen anything unusual, Doutt said.

Police said it’s possible that they talked with the shooter, but they had no way of knowing for certain.

The first police radio report said more than one person may have been injured, but when police arrived, no one with injuries was found, Doutt said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.