Gunman kills security guard in New York City federal building |

Gunman kills security guard in New York City federal building

The Associated Press

NEW YORK — A gunman slipped through a side door of a federal building in Manhattan late Friday afternoon and shot a security guard in the head, killing him, before turning the weapon on himself, police said.

Detectives are investigating what prompted the shooting of FJC Security Services guard Idrissa Camara, 53. The shooter had no apparent ties to the company, FJC said in a statement.

Kevin Downing, of Fort Lee, N.J., entered through a side entrance of the building on Varick Street that houses an immigration court, passport processing center and a regional office for the Department of Labor, a law enforcement official said. The official was not authorized to speak publicly and spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity.

He shot Camara at close range, then walked through the screening area and headed toward an elevator where he encountered another employee, then shot himself in the head, said James O’Neill, a chief with the New York Police Department. Downing was pronounced dead at the scene.

It appears the gunman acted alone, and O’Neill said there was no indication the shooting was terrorism.

Camara, 53, was supposed to have gotten off work at 4 p.m. but agreed to stay on for an extra shift, FJC Security Services said. He was pronounced dead in a nearby hospital.

The senior guard was armed, but he never had a chance to defend himself, according to the company.

“Camara … was an extraordinary Senior Guard who was well trained, cared deeply about his job and knew that building better than anyone else,” said Michael McKeon, a spokesman for the security company.

“Our thoughts and prayers are with his wife and family. We intend to do everything we can to stand with them during this very difficult time.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.