ShareThis Page
Gunn shocked at Pitt’s interest |

Gunn shocked at Pitt’s interest

When Adam Gunn isn’t playing football Friday nights, he’s simulating it by playing “NCAA Football” on PlayStation. And he always uses the same team, the University of Pittsburgh Panthers.

So the Kiski Area free safety was stunned Tuesday when a formal letter from the Panthers arrived in the mail, even though he had received indications from assistants Paul Rhoads and Curtis Bray that they were about to offer a scholarship.

“I knew it was coming, but once I really got it, I was shocked,” Gunn said. “I didn’t know what to think. I’m only a junior.”

The difference is that Gunn is a 6-foot-3, 190-pound junior who runs the 40-yard dash in 4.5 seconds and has a reputation as a big hitter. His athleticism is evident in that he also is the Cavaliers’ quarterback, plays forward on the basketball team and is a sprinter in track and field.

Even though he’s only a junior, Gunn might be Pitt’s next recruit.

“I was thinking from a players’ perspective how I want to go there,” Gunn said after attending Pitt’s 19-16 overtime victory over Boston College on Saturday. “I like the coaches, the players, their style, playing at Heinz Field. A winning program is definitely where an athlete wants to be. They’re winning, and the program is on the rise.

“They know how I feel about them and know I like their program. They know I’m going to go there, but I want to take my time with my family and look into the academics. Right now, I’m just looking at football.”

Gunn said his father, Ed, is urging him to commit now, while his mother, Dona, is advising him to wait so that he can check out Pitt’s academic background before making such an important college decision.

Gunn, an honor roll student who said he is considering majoring in sports management, also is receiving interest from Akron, Michigan, Northwestern, Purdue and West Virginia. He has no other offers, as of yet.

“I don’t know what to think,” Gunn said. “I don’t know how many offers I’m going to get. Pitt’s definitely where I want to go.”

One reason is that Adam, who doesn’t turn 17 until June, wants to stay near his Vandergrift home.

“That’s the main part,” Gunn said. “I definitely want to stay close to my family. I don’t want to go too far.”

The youngest of five children, Gunn’s older brothers also played safety in college but their size indicates that he could grow into an outside linebacker. Sanford (6-4, 220) played free safety at Indiana (Pa.) and Shippensburg, while Vance (6-0, 210) was a strong safety for two years at West Point.

They played a role in toughening up Adam.

“I would say it definitely had a big part in it,” Adam said.

The defense was a main factor in why Kiski Area was one of the top-five teams in WPIAL Quad A before inside linebacker Chris McKillop was lost for the season after suffering a dislocated ankle against Latrobe on Sept. 27.

Since then, Gunn has taken on a leadership role on both sides of the ball. Alhough he had passed for 874 yards and 10 touchdowns going into the weekend, Gunn says defense is his first love. He has 40 tackles, six pass breakups and three interceptions for the Cavaliers (6-3, 5-1 Quad South).

Those defensive statistics are almost identical to those in his sophomore season, when he moved into the starting lineup after receiving Kiski’s “headhunter” award as defensive player of the game in Week 3.

Kiski Area is quickly beginning to rival Woodland Hills as one of the Panthers’ premier pipelines. Chris McKillop became Pitt’s first recruit from the Class of 2003 when he committed this past May. Gunn could be its first from the Class of 2004, perhaps as early as sometime this fall.

“We’ve spent a lot of time together, going down to Pitt,” said Gunn, who is close friends with McKillop’s younger brother, Scott, a junior outside linebacker. “We’ve been playing together since midget football. I could see Scott at Pitt, too. That would be real nice if we all went to the same school.”

That way, Gunn could simulate himself for Pitt on PlayStation.

“That,” he said, “would be great.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.