Archive

Hagel wants billions to overhaul nuke system | TribLIVE.com
News

Hagel wants billions to overhaul nuke system

WASHINGTON — Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel announced plans Friday to overhaul management of the nation’s nuclear weapons, calling for billions of dollars to upgrade equipment, improve training, increase oversight and address security lapses and poor morale.

Speaking at the Pentagon, Hagel said that two reviews he ordered last spring have concluded that sweeping changes are required to address systemic problems that could undermine the safety, security and effectiveness of the United States’ nuclear arsenal.

A series of scandals involving cheating on tests, drug use, violations of security rules and lax supervision have rocked the Pentagon’s nuclear operations force over the past two years. The Air Force has fired at least two nuclear commanders and disciplined others.

Hagel said the ground wars in Iraq and Afghanistan caused the military to take “our eye off the ball” when it came to nuclear weapons.

“We were not paying the attention we should have,” he said.

The investigation found that maintenance crews at three bases where intercontinental missiles are stored had only one wrench among them that was capable of tightening the bolts that affix thermonuclear warheads to their Minuteman III missiles.

The crews had to FedEx the special wrench to one another at the three bases, Hagel said.

“We now have a wrench at each location,” he added. “We’re going to have two wrenches soon.”

The two reviews recommended more than 100 changes, and Hagel said he would make leadership changes, improve training and inspections, and seek an increase in funding.

Hagel said it would cost “several billion dollars” over the next five years to address the shortfalls identified in the reviews.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.