Hampton to face Ringold in Class AAA quarterfinal |

Hampton to face Ringold in Class AAA quarterfinal

Louis Raggiunti | Trib Total Media
Hampton's Nate Hyre is a threat to score whenever he touches the ball.
Gus Schmitt is difficult to bring down in the open field.

At the time, a 20-14 loss to Mars to close out the regular season seemed like a lousy way for Hampton to end a campaign in which it won a conference title.

While the loss was the first of the season, senior quarterback Nick Grabowski said, “It was a blessing in disguise.”

Hampton refocused for the playoffs and came away with a convincing 33-14 win over New Castle.

“We didn’t know what it was like to lose, and it’s not that we played bad, but it let us know we needed to work harder,” Grabowski said.

And work harder the team did.

Against New Castle, Hampton deployed its ground attack featuring Matt Rech and Nick Worobij to complement Grabowski’s passing. The plan worked perfectly.

Grabowski tossed touchdowns to Jack Werling and Nate Hyre and ran for a score. Rech and Worobij combined for 273 yards on the ground, and each scored.

“It was big for both of them to come out with 100-plus yards,” Grabowski said. “Our line made some holes, they broke some tackles, and that set the tone.

“That win proves a lot about our team. We knew what we had going into the game, and we went out and got the win.”

With the win, Hampton advanced to play Ringgold, which is coming off a 24-14 win over Gateway.

Like Hampton, Ringgold ran the ball effectively, piling up 234 yards. But Grabowski said the Rams have a good quarterback as well in Nico Law.

“He is good, and we know we have to contain them and run the ball,” Grabowski said.

Ringgold got a rushing touchdown from Brenden Small to complement Law, who threw for 87 yards and a touchdown. Law also had an interception return for a score to seal the game.

Hampton and Ringgold will play at 7:30 p.m. The site of the game had not been determined as of press time.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.