Archive

ShareThis Page
Hampton wrests Class AA soccer title from Mars | TribLIVE.com
News

Hampton wrests Class AA soccer title from Mars

Hampton sophomore Justin Carter wasn’t surprised. That’s because most of his goals come this way.

Carter struck twice — within 80 seconds — to lead the Talbots to a 4-1 victory over Mars in the WPIAL Class AA boys soccer final yesterday at Baldwin.

Carter converted both goals under the most unlikely of circumstances.

“I tend to score a lot of goals like that,” Carter said.

Hampton, the tournament’s top seed, avenged a 1-0 loss to Mars in last year’s final — the Planets’ third consecutive victory over the Talbots in 2009. This fall, Hampton (21-1) returned the favor, defeating Mars in all three 2010 meetings.

The title is the Talbots’ first since 1990. It also snaps a two-year stretch of dominance for Mars (14-6-2), which won the past two WPIAL crowns but had to win on the last day of the 2010 regular season to make this tournament — as a No. 14 seed.

In the PIAA tournament, Hampton will play Schenley, the District 8 champion, on Tuesday at North Allegheny. Mars will play District 9 champion Bradford on the same night.

Carter’s first goal came on an innocent-looking floater from about 30 yards in the 43rd minute. He followed that by tapping a shot inside the right post after Mars botched a clearing attempt in the 44th minute.

Mars senior Brenden Frank finished a header in the 49th minute before Hampton’s Jonathan Mercier and Erik Donatelli added goals.

Still, it was Carter’s two-goal outburst that made the difference.

“If there was a way to bottle that, I’d like to give it to everybody because players with natural instincts don’t come along all the time,” Hampton coach Chuck Kelley said. “But, really, he’s just one of several great players on this team.”


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.