Hanger drops out of governor’s race |

Hanger drops out of governor’s race

HARRISBURG — Former Department of Environmental Protection Secretary John Hanger, who pushed for legalization of marijuana, withdrew from the Pennsylvania governor’s race on Thursday.

Hanger, 57, of Hershey recently won the support of the ultra-liberal wing of the Democratic Party at the Progressive Summit in Harrisburg, but he had difficulty getting support from Democratic voters at large, early polls showed.

“My primary opponents are excellent candidates and are conducting their campaigns well and honorably, never losing focus on the ultimate goal. It was a privilege to compete with them, and I count them all as friends,” Hanger said.

He said he is confident Republican Gov. Tom Corbett will be defeated.

Five candidates remain in the Democratic contest for the May 20 primary.

“I want to express my profound gratitude to our friends and supporters who have made this not just a campaign for John Hanger for governor, but a real people’s campaign, and in a very real sense, a movement. We won’t stop talking about the issues, we won’t stop working for them,” Hanger said.

Hanger served as a member of the Public Utility Commission under Democratic Gov. Robert P. Casey. He noted in debates that he arrived here from Ireland at age 10 and was proud to be American.

Hanger said he never smoked marijuana. He advocated immediate legalization for medical use. Broader legalization for possession of small amounts would cut huge government costs for enforcement and imprisonment, he said.

Brad Bumsted is Trib Total Media’sstate Capitol reporter. Reach him at 717-787-1405 and [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.