ShareThis Page
Happily ever after |

Happily ever after

Dimitri Vassilaros
| Friday, December 28, 2007 12:00 a.m

“And they lived happily ever after.”

It really was a love that pure, a union that sacred. How could it not have a happy ending?

“Suzy” says her insides were turned inside out, torn apart and shredded into little pieces. A glass of wine or two or five numbed the pain. Her one true love — her husband of 29 years, “the finest person I ever knew in my life” — was torn apart from her.

Prince Charming had seven years on his 19-year-old bride-to-be. Engaged after just three months of dating, “it easily was the best decision I ever made in my life,” she says. You just knew it was his, too. Their sublime DNA created three new lives for a family that seemed too good to be true.

Suzy had felt “less than” — not pretty enough, smart enough or athletic enough — for about 19 years. But affirming her being came naturally to him.

She learned, “I was perfect the way I was.” That lasted about 29 years.

Oct. 8, 1997, was a balmy afternoon as they vacationed in Arizona. Breezy, too. He, the picture of health except for that angioplasty, stepped out for a routine run. She, at the hotel, relaxed with her needlepoint.

He ran back, overwhelmed by chest pain. In their room, Suzy grabbed on to his hand through his convulsions. Then, as their ambulance raced to the ER, she heard EMS workers in the back screaming for this or that and, then, for nothing. It wasn’t official but “I knew it was over.”

“He’s gone, isn’t he,” Suzy told the head paramedic. The helpless lifesaver only could say, “I think so.”

Everyone knew so.

Suzy, too numb to cry, never forgot what that woman said. “She prayed with me. She was an angel.” And then she told Suzy she’d be OK “because men like that marry women like you.”

But OK by when?

“The pain was so great that I wouldn’t wish it on my worst enemy,” said Suzy, calling him her “drug of choice.” Wine gradually became her new one. A lot of wine — too much wine, much too much wine, never enough wine. Day after night after day after night.

Her work suffered. Her family suffered. She suffered.

Suzy couldn’t go two days without a drink. “Maybe I have a problem,” she thought. She couldn’t picture life without wine. But she saw that life with it was unbearable.

Desperation drove her to Alcoholics Anonymous.

Aug. 21, 2002, her first meeting was in Glassport, the second, near the West End Bridge.

“Places I never knew existed,” Suzy says. “I left better than when I came in. It takes me outside of myself and my self-pity.” She even learned to validate herself.

“God made me who I am. That feeling of being ‘less than’ is no longer there. I’m just me and that’s good enough.”

AA and the many other 12-step, self-help meetings for addictions are free, simple and effective. None are very choosy. There’s always an extra chair or two or five. Coffee sometimes, too.

Suzy’s advice: “Even if you consider that you might have a problem — go.”

Hope is a phone call away for free help dealing with a substance or behavior:

&#149 Alcoholics Anonymous — 412-471-7472

&#149 Narcotics Anonymous — 412- 391-5247

&#149 Overeaters Anonymous — 412-765-3004

&#149 Gamblers Anonymous — 412- 281-7484

&#149 United Way Helpline — 412-255-1155

A meeting might help someone live happily ever after.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.