Harhai retains state House seat |

Harhai retains state House seat

A veteran legislator serving the 58th District has won his bid for re-election.

State Rep. R. Ted Harhai, D-Monessen, secured the majority of votes to handily defeat his Republican opponent, Robert Ferguson. A political newcomer, Ferguson is a funeral director in Scottdale.

With 54 of 56 precincts reporting in Westmoreland County as of press time, the unofficial election results had Harhai receiving 9,856 votes to Ferguson’s 7,976.

With 100 percent of the votes counted in the Fayette County communities within the 58th District, Harhai won 595 to 286, securing 68 percent of the votes, according to unofficial election results.

During his election party at the Alpine Club in Monessen, Harhai said he ran a “clean campaign” and believes his hard work and experience helped him win his re-election bid. He was first elected into office in 1998.

He criticized his opponent’s campaign.

Harhai said he appreciates the support during the campaign. He recognizes the movement toward pro-Republican support.

“Some people don’t agree with me and I respect that, but I am a moderate Democrat and I lean right,” Harhai said. “The bottom line is I am here to represent the people. I’m hard working and accessible. That’s something that won’t change.”

Harhai thanked his supporters and campaign volunteers.

“They still believe in me and I am still going to do the best I can,” he said.

Ferguson could not be reached for comment at press time.

The 58th District includes Fayette City, Belle Vernon and parts of Washington Township in Fayette County, and areas of Westmoreland County, including Monessen, North Belle Vernon, West Newton, Smithton, Sutersville, Madison, Arona, Adamsburg, Manor, East Huntingdon, South Huntingdon and Rostraver and Sewickley Townships.

Photo Galleries

Election Day 2010

Election Day 2010

Election day scenes from polling places around the Pittsburgh area, Tuesday, November 2, 2010.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.