Archive

ShareThis Page
Harris: Buckeyes, Spartans see each other as obstacles, not necessarily rivals | TribLIVE.com
News

Harris: Buckeyes, Spartans see each other as obstacles, not necessarily rivals

Tribune-Review
| Thursday, November 6, 2014 10:45 p.m.
gtrMeyer110714
Michigan State coach Mark Dantonio (right) is congratulated by Ohio State coach Urban Meyer after the Big Ten championship game Saturday, Dec. 8, 2013, in Indianapolis.

Michigan State defeated Ohio State in last year’s Big Ten championship game, ending the Buckeyes’ 24-game winning streak.

This year, the teams won’t meet for the conference title, even though they remain the teams to beat.

The Buckeyes and Spartans share the lead in the East Division. They are 7-1 overall, 4-0 in league play. The winner of Saturday’s game at Michigan State is expected to face West Division leader Nebraska (8-1, 4-1) in the Big Ten championship game Dec. 6 in Indianapolis.

For Ohio State coach Urban Meyer, whose team still must face Michigan in their annual border rivalry, it begs the question: Does Michigan State trump the Buckeyes’ traditional rival Michigan, a struggling opponent whose coach (Brady Hoke) could be appearing in his last game when the teams play Nov. 29 in Columbus?

“I grew up in the 10-year war (Ohio State-Michigan), and there’s a saying around here: You can lose every game you play except for the team up north,” said Meyer, who is 31-3 with the Buckeyes, including 20-0 in regular-season Big Ten play.

“We all know that’s not true.”

What is true, at least according to Meyer, is that an Ohio State victory against Michigan in the rivalry game won’t make up for a loss to Michigan State.

“We have one rival here,” said Meyer, referring to Michigan, which is 4-5 overall and 2-3 in the East Division. “What’s happened in this situation is you have an excellent team (Michigan State). After watching them on film, they’re a great team. And they stand in the way of a Big Ten championship. They stood in the way last year, and we failed.

“Does that make them a rival? It makes them in the way of something that we all want. And that’s a Big Ten championship. To say this is a rivalry game, that would diminish the rivalry that’s been here for 100 years.”

During a week in which every word spoken by players and coaches is scrutinized as potential bulletin-board material, Michigan State coach Mark Dantonio, Ohio State’s defensive coordinator from 2001-2003, isn’t bothered by Meyer’s comments.

“Our (rivals) right now are Michigan and Notre Dame,” Dantonio said. “That’s how I see our rivals at Michigan State.”

Michigan State players view the Ohio State game differently from their coach.

“I think we treat it as a rivalry game because we have a lot of guys on our team from Ohio who take this personally,” said Michigan State junior quarterback Connor Cook, a native of suburban Cleveland who ranks second in the Big Ten in passing efficiency behind Ohio State freshman J.T. Barrett.

“Some guys before the game, they get up and want to talk to us. They said Ohio State never recruited them, and they want to prove themselves.

“We’ll see what goes down on Saturday, if there is any pushing or shoving or whatever.”

John Harris is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at jharris@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.