ShareThis Page
Harris says he’s happy at Pitt |

Harris says he’s happy at Pitt

| Wednesday, January 3, 2001 12:00 a.m

Pitt football coach Walt Harris is a candidate for the vacant coaching job at Ohio State.

The position opened Tuesday when Buckeyes coach John Cooper was fired with three years remaining on his contract following a 24-7 loss to South Carolina in the Outback Bowl on New Year’s Day.

Harris, 54, spent two years (1995 and 1996) as the quarterbacks coach at Ohio State under Cooper, and said last year that he could be interested in the Ohio State job when rumors of Cooper’s possible firing circulated.

In an effort to keep Harris from dealing with an onslaught of inquires from the media, Pitt released the following statement from Harris yesterday afternoon:

‘I’m extremely happy at the University of Pittsburgh, and I’m not looking to leave,’ Harris said in the statement. ‘I’m excited about what we have accomplished here, and I believe that we have an exciting future at the University of Pittsburgh.’

In Harris’ final season at Ohio State, the Buckeyes had one of the nation’s most prolific offenses, averaging more than 450 yards per game. He is credited with calling the plays on a last-minute scoring drive that culminated in a touchdown and a dramatic, last-second, 20-17 victory over Arizona State in the Rose Bowl.

Harris helped to develop former Ohio State quarterback Bobby Hoying, who threw for a school-record 3,269 yards with 29 touchdowns in 1995. He also worked with Buckeyes wide receivers David Boston, Rickey Dudley and Terry Glenn, all of whom were first-round NFL draft choices.

Harris’ name has been popping up recently for job openings, thanks in large part to his success this season at Pitt. The Panthers finished with a 7-4 regular-season record before losing to Iowa State, 37-29, in the Bowl on Thursday.

Pitt’s overall record of 7-5 was its best since 1989, and Harris’ passing offense placed first in the Big East for the third time in his four seasons.

Harris, who is 20-26 at Pitt, interviewed for the coaching position at Alabama last month before the job went to Dennis Franchione, formerly of TCU. Harris also is a candidate for the job as the first coach of the Houston Texans, an expansion team that enters the NFL in 2002.

As for the Ohio State position, Harris joins Minnesota coach Glen Mason, a former Ohio State assistant who owns an 81-89-1 record in 15 years as a college coach, and Youngstown State coach Jim Tressel on a short list of preliminary candidates. Ohio State athletic director Andy Geiger said at the press conference yesterday to announce Cooper’s firing that he will be patient in his efforts to find a new coach.

‘We will be diligent and thorough and take the time necessary to recruit the best possible fit,’ Geiger said.

Other names that have been circulating as Ohio State coaching candidates are Terry Bowden, the former Auburn coach who is currently working as a television analyst; and Oklahoma coach Bob Stoops, whose team plays Florida State for the national championship tonight. Stoops is a former Ohio State assistant and is a native of Youngstown.

Harris, who signed a contract extension in March that runs through 2006, could double his estimated $500,000 salary if he were to take the job at Ohio State. When Harris was courted by Alabama in December, Pitt athletic director Steve Pederson said he would make every attempt possible to retain Harris.

‘It’s my job to keep us in a competitive position and to make sure that we’re doing that,’ Pederson said. ‘We’re going to do that on a consistent basis and I think we’ve already done that through the contract extension from last year. It’s my job to keep pace with what needs to be done around here.’

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.