ShareThis Page
Harris to keep quarterbacks away from media |

Harris to keep quarterbacks away from media

Joe Bendel
| Thursday, August 12, 2004 12:00 a.m

The Pitt coach believes more scrutiny will be placed on this year’s QBs.

Having learned from the past, Pitt coach Walt Harris said he plans to insulate starting quarterback candidates Tyler Palko and Luke Getsy from the media this year, particularly during training camp.

Harris came to the conclusion for a number of reasons, not the least of which was the mini-media circus that surrounded dueling quarterbacks John Turman and David Priestley four years ago.

“I think, maybe, we were too easily approached, and it made it worse,” said Harris, whose team opens camp this morning. “A couple years ago, we were just thankful to have articles written about our program. We just want to handle this differently.”

Harris believes more scrutiny would be placed on his current quarterbacks, compared to Turman and Priestley, because both are former WPIAL stars. Palko, who redshirted last season, played at West Allegheny. Getsy, who was 3 of 13 for 32 yards in 2003, played at Steel Valley. The redshirt sophomores have combined for five completions in their careers.

“They’re younger, and they’re both from this area,” Harris said. “We just want to keep things from getting to be too much. I think it’s best for both of them.”

By shielding the players from the media, Harris believes it will eliminate some distractions.

“These guys are very into it,” Harris said of Palko and Getsy. “They’re great competitors, and I think they just want to get in there and start getting after it. We’ll do everything we can to keep it from being a circus. We need to keep them focused.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.