ShareThis Page
Harry Reid joins critics of Ground Zero mosque |

Harry Reid joins critics of Ground Zero mosque

| Tuesday, August 17, 2010 12:00 a.m

WASHINGTON — The Senate’s senior Democrat broke with President Obama yesterday over the proposed Muslim cultural center and mosque in New York City, with Sen. Harry Reid saying it should be built elsewhere.

The project, planned near ground zero, has emerged as an emotional issue 2 1/2 months before congressional elections in which Republicans are trying to take back control of Congress from Obama’s fellow Democrats. Reid is in a tight contest for re-election against a very conservative Republican challenger.

“The First Amendment protects freedom of religion. Senator Reid respects that but thinks that the mosque should be built someplace else,” said Reid spokesman Jim Manley.

Including Reid, at least three Democrats broke from the White House — and party insiders expected more to follow suit, primarily moderates in conservative places. Several House Republican candidates issued statements demanding that their Democratic opponents say where they stand on the issue.

The project’s backers vowed to press ahead with their plans and denied a report in Israeli newspaper Haaretz that they will scrap the $100 million project, which has generated fierce debate.

Sharif El-Gamal, the owner of the building where the Cordoba House would be located, said a Haaretz report that the center would be relocated farther from ground zero, was false.

“Everything is on track, and we are moving forward with the location,” said El-Gamal, chief executive of Soho Properties, which owns the building.

Haaretz reported that leaders agreed to abandon the site to prevent an escalation of anti-Muslim sentiment.

The proposal, announced this spring, has caused an uproar among many New Yorkers who feel the location of the center is insensitive to the memory of the nearly 3,000 people who died on 9/11.

On Friday, the debate over the construction of the Muslim center intensified when President Obama said he supported the right of Muslims to build there.

A day later, amid a political backlash, Obama said he was not commenting on “the wisdom of making a decision to put a mosque there.” Instead, he said he was “commenting very specifically on the right people have that dates back to our founding.”

Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., who opposes the mosque project, said yesterday that the White House softened Obama’s original comments because it probably heard “pushback” from other Democrats. He said Obama was “clearly” taking a side on the issue, no matter what he claims.

“Everyone says as far as I know that the Muslim community has the right to build a mosque. The whole question is whether they should or not,” he said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.