Archive

ShareThis Page
Hastert denies charges tied to scandal | TribLIVE.com
News

Hastert denies charges tied to scandal

Jennifer R. Vertullo
| Tuesday, June 9, 2015 8:18 p.m
APTOPIXDennisHastertIndictmentJPEG03786
Former House Speaker Dennis Hastert, arrives at the federal courthouse Tuesday, June 9, 2015, in Chicago for his arraignment on federal charges that he broke federal banking laws and lied about the money when questioned by the FBI. The indictment two weeks ago alleged Hastert agreed to pay $3.5 million to someone from his days as a high school teacher not to reveal a secret about past misconduct. (AP Photo/Christian K. Lee)

CHICAGO — Former House Speaker Dennis Hastert, in his first public appearance since being indicted in an alleged hush money scandal, pleaded not guilty Tuesday in federal court to charges that he lied to the FBI and illegally structured bank withdrawals to pay off a former associate for misconduct that is believed to have occurred decades ago.

Hastert navigated a gantlet of news crews outside the federal courthouse to enter his plea and break a nearly two-week silence since prosecutors detailed allegations that the 73-year-old former speaker agreed to pay nearly $3.5 million to a person identified in court documents as “Individual A,” someone Hastert has known for most of the person’s life.

The indictment did not specify the misconduct, but a federal law enforcement official has told USA Today that the activity was sexual in nature and involved a young man Hastert knew during his tenure as a teacher and coach at Yorkville High School, a small town west of Chicago where Hastert once served as a wrestling coach and teacher. Prosecutors allege the person was paid $1.7 million before the charges were made public.

The former Republican lawmaker appeared before Judge Thomas Durkin, who has made a total of $1,500 in campaign donations in 2002 and 2004 to Hastert. Durkin, appointed to the federal bench by President Obama in 2012, acknowledged the contributions in open court.

He disclosed past working associations with one of Hastert’s sons and with one of the former speaker’s defense attorneys, yet he asserted that he could be fair. Nevertheless, he said he would remove himself from the case unless lawyers on both sides decided to waive objections and allow him to stay on. He gave attorneys until Thursday to make a decision.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.