ShareThis Page
Health care options |

Health care options

| Thursday, June 26, 2008 12:00 a.m

Most workers and employers are struggling with rising health care costs.

So it was no surprise to see that our towns are experiencing health care sticker shock for 2008. The average costs are up about 15 percent for employers with fewer than 50 workers.

Here are just three examples:

&#149 Lower Burrell will see a 10 percent increase in insurance costs this year for its 42 covered full-time employees. It will cost $687,000 this year, up from $626,000 last year. That’s an average $16,000 cost per worker.

&#149 In Tarentum, costs are up 16 percent. The borough’s insurance will be $231,000 this year for 30 workers, up $32,000 from last year. That’s about $7,500 for each worker’s health care.

&#149 In Plum, costs are up by 5 percent. That means taxpayers will pay $50,000 more, or $973,000, up from $923,000 in 2007, for 65 workers. That averages out to about $15,000 per worker.

The Kaiser Family Foundation reported that its annual survey in 2007 found that employers’ premiums for family coverage averaged $12,000, with employees picking up $3,300 of that, or about 25 percent.

Contributions to health care costs by public employees often lag those by private sector employees.

In the private sector, co-pays of $25 for doctor visits, brand name prescriptions or physical therapy are common — as are deductibles of $500 or $1,000 per family before tests or procedures are covered.

And the latest health care trend for employers is to offer high deductible plans, of $3,000 or more, to hold down costs.

We encourage municipalities to look at some of these options. It’s a way to hold down costs for taxpayers, many of whom are paying much more out of their own pocket for health care.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.