ShareThis Page
Health-care truth |

Health-care truth

| Tuesday, October 29, 2013 9:00 p.m

The Trib should be applauded for addressing reality in the editorial “The ObamaCare treatment: Hold on to your wallets” (Oct. 15 and Instead, Media Matters for America ( throws a punch, then dodges the truth.

The left-wing activist group devoted to “correcting conservative misinformation” labels the editorial an attack on ObamaCare premiums and calls the Commonwealth Foundation’s analysis misleading.

Its complaint? Our premium analysis did not take tax credits or subsidies into account.

First, Media Matters doesn’t dispute that premiums will skyrocket. It’s now plain to both sides that ObamaCare will significantly inflate health insurance costs across the state for all age groups.

Plus, many will not qualify for government giveaways that artificially hide the real costs from consumers. In fact, the Manhattan Institute estimates less than half of Pennsylvania’s uninsured qualify for a tax credit.

Where do these subsidies or tax credits come from? The very same people shopping on the “exchange”!

ObamaCare includes more than 20 taxes to pay for these tax credits. One adds a 2.3-percent surcharge to every medical-device sale.

The federal government is simply taking dollars from taxpayers’ pockets and giving $1.2 trillion in subsidies to insurance companies over the next 10 years to claim “significant savings.”

Don’t be fooled: The real cost of health care is skyrocketing, and we’re all paying.

Elizabeth Stelle


The writer is a policy analyst with the Commonwealth Foundation (

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.