ShareThis Page
ADHD linked to teen digital media use |

ADHD linked to teen digital media use

Usa Today
| Tuesday, July 17, 2018 10:30 p.m
In this Friday, Sept. 16, 2017, file photo, a person uses a smart phone in Chicago.

SAN FRANCISCO — Teenagers who frequently use digital media are more likely to develop attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, according to a new study.

In 2014 scientists at the University of Southern California, led by Adam Leventhal, a professor of preventive medicine and psychology and director of the USC Health, Emotion and Addiction Laboratory at the Keck School of Medicine of USC, embarked on a two-year study to discover whether the amount and frequency of digital media usage among teens was associated with the occurrence of ADHD.

They found that teens who used digital media the most were twice as likely to develop new ADHD symptoms over two years than teens who used social media the least.

“This study raises concern whether the proliferation of high-performance digital media technologies may be putting a new generation of youth at risk for ADHD,” Leventhal said.

ADHD is a condition involving persistent difficulty sustaining attention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity, according to the study. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates 6.1 million, or nearly one in 10 children in the United States, have ADHD.

Past research has looked at whether television and video games have an effect on ADHD occurrence, but new research was necessary with the advent of new digital media which are “constantly available via mobile devices, and capable of providing rapid high-intensity stimulation,” the scientists wrote.

The results of the study have ramifications for parents, teachers, doctors and tech companies. A recent survey from Common Sense Media found that teens spend nearly nine hours per day using online media, and a separate survey published last month by the CDC found 43 percent of teens use digital media three or more hours per day.

Over a two-year period, the USC scientists studied 2,587 high school students age 15 to 16 in Los Angeles County from schools of varied demographic and socioeconomic status. Only students who didn’t show ADHD symptoms were selected for the survey.

Scientists surveyed the eligible students in the fall of 2014 for a baseline of results, then conducted follow-up surveys every six months over a 24-month period, hoping to discover whether digital media use in 10th grade was associated with ADHD symptoms tracked through 12th grade.

Students were asked how often they use 14 popular digital media platforms including social media, streaming video, text messaging, music downloads and online chatrooms, among others. They were also asked questions related to common ADHD symptoms.

They found 9.5 percent of the 114 children who used half the digital media platforms frequently and 10.5 percent of the 51 kids who used all 14 platforms frequently showed new ADHD symptoms.

By contrast, 4.6 percent of the 495 students who were not frequent users of any digital activity showed ADHD symptoms, about the background rate of the disorder in the general population.

The results appeared Tuesday in a report published in the Journal of the American Medical Association .

Researchers concluded that, “Among adolescents followed up over 2 years, there was a statistically significant but modest association between higher frequency of digital media use and subsequent symptoms of ADHD.”

It’s not clear, however, whether digital media use causes ADHD or if teens who develop ADHD are using digital media more than those without ADHD.

Categories: Health Now
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.