Archive

Airports asked to post MERS advisory, but Pittsburgh not targeted by CDC | TribLIVE.com
Health

Airports asked to post MERS advisory, but Pittsburgh not targeted by CDC

PTRWEATHERSIDE020913
Pittsburgh International Airport is not among the 22 airports that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention asked to post an advisory about Middle East respiratory syndrome, or MERS, according to the Transportation Safety Administration.

A mysterious respiratory virus from the Middle East that turned up in the United States does not constitute a global health emergency, the World Health Organization concluded on Wednesday, even as some U.S. airports circulated a federal health warning about the ailment.

Pittsburgh International Airport is not among the 22 airports that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention asked to post an advisory about Middle East respiratory syndrome, or MERS, according to the Transportation Safety Administration.

The CDC did not respond to a Tribune-Review inquiry about the one-page document, which encourages travelers to the Arabian Peninsula to wash their hands often, avoid touching their faces and prevent close contact with sick people.

Airports in Detroit, New York and Philadelphia are displaying the warning, which identifies MERS symptoms that include a fever, cough and shortness of breath.

“When you’re picking and choosing which airports you’re going to put those (advisories) in, you should target those that have the most traffic from those areas” in the Middle East, said Dr. Amesh A. Adalja, an infectious disease physician at UPMC.

Still, he said Pittsburgh and other lower-risk cities could encounter MERS, blamed for sickening more than 500 people and killing 145 since 2012, mostly in the Middle East. Most cases have been in Saudi Arabia, although the virus has appeared in Asia, North Africa and Europe.

Health officials in Florida this week confirmed a second U.S. case of MERS. The patient in the first U.S. case, a man in Indiana, was discharged from a hospital last week.

The second U.S. patient is a resident of Saudi Arabia who was visiting Florida and hospitalized in an Orlando hospital. He flew through airports in London, Boston and Atlanta.

Orlando ranks as the most popular flight destination among Pittsburgh air travelers, according to Allegheny County Airport Authority data. Boston ranks second, and Atlanta is fourth.

All but one of the airports asked to post MERS warning signs are among Pittsburgh’s top 50 flight destinations, with a combined 5,000 daily travelers during the first quarter of 2013, the data show.

Washington’s Dulles International Airport, on the warning list, isn’t among Pittsburgh’s top 50 destinations. United Airlines makes four daily flights to Dulles, but more than 80 percent of passengers go there to catch connecting flights elsewhere.

Neither the CDC nor the TSA has contacted Pittsburgh International about MERS, airport spokeswoman JoAnn Jenny said. At the World Health Organization, an assistant director-general, Dr. Keiji Fukuda, said there isn’t proof of the virus’ sustained transmission among people.

“We are so connected by airplane travel that we have to be aware of what’s happening, particularly when new viruses appear, because we don’t know what direction they’re going to take,” said Dr. Karen Hacker, director of the Allegheny County Health Department. “But in the relative scheme of what’s going to happen to an individual, this isn’t at the top of my list.”

Adam Smeltz and Tom Fontaine are Trib Total Media staff writers. Reach Smeltz at 412-380-5676 or [email protected] and Fontaine at 412-320-7847 or [email protected]. The Associated Press contributed.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.