ShareThis Page
In A Heartbeat: Dr. Karl E. Bushman discusses vitamin D |

In A Heartbeat: Dr. Karl E. Bushman discusses vitamin D

| Tuesday, March 15, 2016 10:08 a.m

The issue: Sellers of vitamin D claim the nutrient can lower blood pressure. Some studies recently suggested vitamin D lowers the risk of heart disease. Dr. Karl E. Bushman, an internist at St. Clair Hospital in Mt. Lebanon, answers questions about vitamin D.

Are there truly scientifically proven benefits to taking vitamin D?

The well-established benefits of vitamin D have to do with improved absorption of calcium that we eat and improved bone density as a result of calcium being deposited in the bones. Infants and children with extremely low vitamin D levels could get rickets, a bone development problem. Adults with very low vitamin D levels are more at risk for osteoporosis, which can lead to hip fractures or spine fractures. Many other benefits of vitamin D have been proposed, but the proof is not as strong.

Should people take any vitamin D at all?

The Institute of Medicine recommends 600 international units (iu) of vitamin D a day for people 1-70 years old and 800 iu for age 71 and up. Individuals with high risk or other diseases may require different doses based on their particular situation and medical evaluation. Moderate sun exposure helps vitamin D levels by converting less active forms to more active forms. Ten to 15 minutes of sun exposure at midday is a sufficient amount. Milk and orange juice have vitamin D fortification at 400 iu per liter (roughly a quart).

The bottom line? In this country, vitamins and dietary supplements do not need to prove safety or efficacy to be marketed. Vitamin D has much more research behind it that many supplements. Many people wonder if they should take a supplement because “they say it’s good for you.” I suggest asking if “they” are people you trust, if the “good” proposed is something you want or need, and if taking it actually gives “you” the “good” you seek.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.