More kids with mental disorders, Pittsburgh-based study shows |

More kids with mental disorders, Pittsburgh-based study shows

The number of children with developmental conditions such as autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder jumped by 28 percent for some families, a Pittsburgh-based national study shows.

The two-year project led by Dr. Amy Houtrow at Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC found poor homes have the highest known rates of intellectual and physical disabilities in youths, while reports of pediatric mental health and neurodevelopmental issues are climbing faster in families that make at least four times the federal poverty level. For a family of four, that would be $95,400 a year.

Houtrow said her discovery does not necessarily mean impairments are proliferating more rapidly for higher-income families. Instead, she said, it could reflect better awareness, detection and services for those with easier access to health care.

“We need to rise to the challenge to help children be as capable and functional as possible, so they can have the best lives possible,” said Houtrow, chief of pediatric rehabilitation medicine at Children’s. She said the findings can become a foundation for more research into root causes of developmental conditions and how to prevent them across socioeconomic groups.

Using federal data from the National Health Interview Survey, Houtrow and a cross-country team of colleagues found 54 of 1,000 children in wealthier households in 2011 had known disabilities related to mental health or neurodevelopmental concerns, including learning disabilities or language disorders. That was up 28.4 percent in 10 years.

Meanwhile, 83 of 1,000 children in poverty had such impairments in 2011, up from 72 per 1,000 in 2001. Doctors generally cite premature birth rates, inadequate access to health care and other struggles in explaining chronic health problems among the poor.

Plus, symptoms of neurodevelopmental conditions can be tough to spot. It took months before early suspicions led to a formal ADHD diagnosis for Elizabeth Strickland’s eldest son about 12 years ago, Strickland said.

She said he was smart enough to enroll in a gifted program through the Pittsburgh Public Schools but struggled to stay focused.

“He wasn’t a bad kid. Those things were beyond what he could do,” said Strickland, 44, of Windgap, the early intervention coordinator for the city schools.

She credits a pediatrician for drawing attention early to the possibility of ADHD, before her son, now 19, began grade school.

“Kids can be evaluated in a variety of settings now,” including at school, Strickland said. “It used to be that you had to wait months and months to get them into a child development unit” for screening.

It’s understandable that lower-income families would have less time, less information and fewer resources to investigate care that might ease or prevent developmental conditions, said Daniel A. Torisky, president of the Autism Society of Pittsburgh.

“If this is true, it’s a wake-up call for advocacy organizations — all of us,” he said of Houtrow’s study. “We’ve got to keep getting the word out about possible causes so people can avail themselves of information.”

Houtrow said her work shows a bright spot: a 12 percent decline in health-related physical disabilities in children.

She said that might result from better treatment of physical ailments.

The National Institutes of Health supported her study, findings of which appear in the September issue of the journal Pediatrics.

“There’s a lot more we can do as a health care system and as a broader society in ensuring children get the services they need, and the accommodations, in order to be as successful as possible,” Houtrow said.

Adam Smeltz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5676 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.