Archive

ShareThis Page
Health staffing company settles federal complaint it discriminated against HIV positive job applicant | TribLIVE.com
News

Health staffing company settles federal complaint it discriminated against HIV positive job applicant

Tribune-Review
| Friday, November 28, 2014 10:35 a.m

A Maryland health staffing company has agreed to pay a rejected job applicant $75,000 to settle an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission lawsuit, according to a consent decree filed Friday in federal court.

The EEOC claimed in the lawsuit that the Robinson office of Maxim Healthcare Services Inc. of Columbia, Md., refused in May 2012 to hire a man to sit with patients at a Veterans Administration hospital because he is HIV positive.

In addition to paying the man, identified only as John Doe, the company has agreed to make annual reports for the next three years providing the names and contact information for each employee who complains about discrimination and everyone it refuses to hire.

“Maxim believes it has complied with all applicable federal and state employment laws,” said company spokeswoman Rebecca Kirkham. “However, this agreement allows us to avoid protracted litigation and move forward with the important work of serving our patients and clients.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.