ShareThis Page
Highmark Medicare Advantage members get longer access to UPMC, judge rules |

Highmark Medicare Advantage members get longer access to UPMC, judge rules

| Monday, January 29, 2018 4:45 p.m

A portion of the divorce between Highmark Health and UPMC will be delayed for six months, a Commonwealth Court judge ruled Monday.

Senior Judge Dan Pellegrini ruled that Highmark Medicare Advantage members will have in-network access to UPMC doctors and facilities for all of 2019.

UPMC contended access should conclude after June 30, 2019, when a consent decree between both health systems expires.

“We have long said this decision was the intention of the Highmark and UPMC consent decrees,” Highmark spokesman Aaron Billger said. “Today’s ruling brings much needed clarity to the community. We will work in full compliance with the ruling and trust UPMC will do the same. We have a singular focus and that’s doing what is right for our members.”

The state brokered a consent decree governing relations between the health care companies in 2014 after the companies couldn’t resolve contract disputes. The terms of the 2014 agreement expire at the end of June 2019.

UPMC said it plans to appeal Pellegrini’s decision.

“This decision is incorrect, we disagree with it and will appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court,” UPMC spokesman Paul Wood said. “We expect to have clarity on this prior to the start of October’s Medicare Advantage open enrollment period.”

The state, through Attorney General Josh Shapiro, argued on behalf of Highmark’s assertion that the Highmark Medicare Advantage members should be given access until the end of 2019.

“I agree with the Commonwealth’s suggested resolution,” Pellegrini wrote in his ruling. “It provides certainty to Highmark MA Plan subscribed as well as to Highmark and UPMC regarding their obligations for calendar year 2019…”

Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro praised the ruling.

“This court ruling helps protect Western Pennsylvanians’ health care coverage and simplifies patients’ lives,” Shapiro said in a statement. “The decision today will save consumers money, provide them stability to keep seeing their regular physicians at the same in-network rates through the end of 2019, and give them time to explore future coverage options.”

Ben Schmitt is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7991, or via Twitter at @Bencschmitt.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.