ShareThis Page
Healthy Simonitis hopes to straighten out line |

Healthy Simonitis hopes to straighten out line

| Friday, October 8, 2004 12:00 a.m

The much-maligned Pitt offensive line should get a boost Saturday at Temple with the healthy return of right guard John Simonitis.

The 6-foot-4, 315-pound sophomore, who started 11 games last season, has been hampered by a high left ankle sprain and missed the Panthers’ (2-2, 0-1 Big East) first three contests. He made his first appearance in a 29-17 loss at Connecticut eight days ago, but did not start.

He’ll take over for his replacement, senior Matt Maiers, against the Owls (1-4, 0-0) at Lincoln Financial Field. He brings much-needed experience — only senior left tackle Rob Petitti has started more games — and a keen understanding of the position.

“It’s hard watching from the sidelines,” said Simonitis, who was named to The Sporting News Big East All-Freshman team in 2003. “I wanted to be out there.”

Simonitis has been witness to an offensive line that gets whistled for an inordinate number of pre-snap penalties and consistently breaks down in pass coverage. Moreover, the Panthers have netted 100-plus rushing yards just once this season, which is why they’re ranked 102nd nationally in that category at 94.75 yards per game.

The coaching staff believes Simonitis could solidify the right side. He’ll line up next to rotating right tackles Dale Williams and Mike McGlynn, a duo with little experience. Those players are responsible for protecting left-handed quarterback Tyler Palko’s blind side.

“If we screw up, we let the game go,” Simonitis said.

Simonitis is just glad to be back on the field. He feared the worst when defensive tackle Vince Crochunis got pushed over and landed on the ankle a week before the opener against Ohio.

“I thought my ankle was broken,” Simonitis said. “I thought my season was over.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.