Archive

ShareThis Page
Hearings start on jail leave abuse | TribLIVE.com
News

Hearings start on jail leave abuse

State officials will hold disciplinary hearings for 14 corrections supervisors accused of abusing leave time at a prison in Mercer County, a spokeswoman for the Department of Corrections said Tuesday.

The hearings begin today and will continue through Friday in Mercer and at correctional institutions in Pittsburgh, Greensburg and Greene County, according to Susan McNaughton.

The allegations involve 13 supervisors at Mercer and one who previously worked there and transferred to the Pittsburgh prison at Woods Run, she said.

Officials are expected to send the findings to corrections headquarters in Harrisburg for review within two weeks, McNaughton said.

The supervisors could be cleared or could face discipline as severe as dismissal, she said.

The exact nature of the allegations cannot be disclosed, she said.

The president of the union representing rank-and-file officers said if the allegations are proven to be true, the supervisors should repay money they were not due.

“I find it disgraceful that supervisors would misuse the leave program,” said Roy Pinto, president of the Pennsylvania State Corrections Officers Association.

The names of the supervisors involved will not be released at this point because the issue is a personnel matter, McNaughton said.

“They are not hearings involving a court judge, but are made of various experienced corrections officials who work together to hear all sides of an issue and then determine appropriate discipline, which can range from written reprimands, suspension and termination, depending upon the severity of the issue being heard,” she said.

Repaying money is something that would be considered if officials find merit to the allegations, McNaughton said.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.