ShareThis Page
Hempfield clinches playoff berth |

Hempfield clinches playoff berth

Paul Schofield
| Friday, January 28, 2005 12:00 a.m

When the Hempfield Area girls basketball team started Section 1-AAAA play with three consecutive losses, Spartans coach Gene Brisbane didn’t panic.

The veteran coach and his team went back to the basics. They concentrated on good defense, rebounding and being patient on offense.

The result, Hempfield has won 8 of 9 section games, and Thursday it clinched a spot in the WPIAL Class AAAA playoffs with an impressive 49-33 victory over rival Greensburg Salem.

Hempfield (11-8 overall and 8-4 section) used smothering defense and dominating board play by Rachel Martinko, Samantha Wanichko and Natalie Foy.

Martinko, a 6-foot junior forward, scored 16 points and pulled down 10 rebounds to lead the Spartans. It was the eighth time this season Martinko has recorded a double-double.

“We’re playing pretty good basketball,” Brisbane said. “This was only the seventh time this season we had everyone ready to play.”

Wanichko (13 points) and Brittany Bell (11) have been sidelined at various times during the season with injuries. Wanichko has been battling ankle injuries, and Bell has been out with a shin injury.

“Through this current stretch, we’ve had at least two or three players score double figures,” Brisbane said. “I’m very pleased how we’ve bounced back.”

Hempfield raced out to a 6-0 lead last night and never looked back. The Spartans led 12-8 after one quarter and 25-12 at halftime. Martinko led the way with 10 points in the opening half.

“Their zones gave us trouble,” Greensburg Salem coach Tim Kimmel said. “We were either unable or unwilling to attack their defense. They got us going side to side, and we didn’t attack with confidence.”

And when the Golden Lions did get open looks at the basket, they weren’t hitting.

“They were unsure what defense we were in,” Brisbane said. “We disguised it, and the players ran it well. We also kept changing the defense on them.”

The Spartans stretched their lead to 40-23 in the fourth quarter before an 8-0 run by the Golden Lions, which included six points from Rachel Roddy, closed the margin to 40-31. Roddy led Greensburg Salem with 15 points, and Annie Olesky had 9.

“We weren’t aggressive on the boards, which was disappointing,” Kimmel said. “I didn’t see too many brown shirts going after the ball.”

Bell ended the Golden Lions’ comeback by nailing eight consecutive free throws in the final 1:20.

“You don’t want to foul Brittany,” Brisbane said. “She’s deadly from the foul line.”

Brisbane then paused and reflected on the season.

“We went back to the fundamentals,” he said. “I don’t know of too many teams that started out 0-3, then comeback and clinched a playoff spot with two games left in the season.”

Despite the loss, Greensburg Salem (13-9, 6-6) and Greater Latrobe (12-7, 6-6) remained tied for the final playoff spot. The two will meet at 7:30 p.m. Monday. It’s a must-win game for the Golden Lions, who lost 78-70 to the Wildcats earlier this season.

Hempfield will play host to unbeaten Altoona (18-0) at 2 p.m. Saturday in a non-section game.

Paul Schofield is a Tribune-Review sports reporter. You can contact Paul by email at or via Twitter .

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.