ShareThis Page
Hempfield sacrifices itself to PIAA win |

Hempfield sacrifices itself to PIAA win

Brian Hunger
| Tuesday, June 5, 2001 12:00 a.m

Usually, when a softball team wins 5-1, there’s a lot of offense.

Monday afternoon, the Hempfield High School softball team proved that theory wrong en route to a 5-1 defeat of Central Mountain (12-12) in a PIAA first round playoff game at Boalsburg’s Hess Field.

The Spartans’ bats were cold for the second straight game, as they had only three hits, but Hempfield mastered all the other ingredients neccessary for sucess – pitching, defense and bunting.

All told, the Spartan’s used six sacrifice bunts, all of which were performed to perfection, to set up three of their runs, and rode the dynamite arm of star pitcher Tina Skelly to defeat the District 6-AAA champion Wildcats.

‘The short game got us a number of runs,’ Hempfield coach Bob Kalp said. ‘They didn’t handle it well at all, and we were executing it very well. We had several good ones which generated positive situations. Hey, that’s how you score without any hits.’

Central Mountain also had the offensive woes, as the Wildcats also managed just three hits. Hempfield combined Skelly’s 13 strikeout performance with an error-free defensive showcase to keep its opponent pinned to the floor the entire contest.

‘I was real pleased with our defense,’ Kalp, whose team had dismal defenisve day in last week’s WPIAL Championship, said. ‘It’s really nice to have no errors, but I know we need to hit a lot better to keep moving on.’

According to Kalp, his teams’ running into Central Mountain pitcher Amber Struble, who doesn’t pitch as hard as many pitchers the Spartans have faced to this point, may have been a deterent.

‘When you’re used to fast pitchers, for some reason, it’s hard to adjust to pitchers who don’t throw as hard. I don’t know why, but we don’t hit well against them. But, you just have to generate offense without it (hitting), and see what happens.

One method Hempfield used to its advantage in the 3rd inning was, with one out, having back-to-back batters (Robin Regina and Ashley Hainsworth) beaned. Both runners then scored on a throwing error by Struble to first base on Linsdey Anderson’s bunt attempt.

The Spatans used the sacrifice approach again in the 4th to score another run. After top hitter and catcher Amanda Bower, who was then pinch run for by Alli Czamecki, drew a walk, two consecutive sacrifeces were made to advance Czamecki to third. Nicole Scheeren then delievered an RBI single to make the score 3-0.

From there, it was Skelly’s show, as the senior dominated the Wildcats in her future college’s backyard (Penn State), who didn’t hit one ball to the outfield or to the left side of the infield.

‘Tina pitched a nice ballgame’ Kalp said. ‘They had three hits, but at this level you’re going to give up the hits. Defensively, we had it all working today.’

The Spartans responded well after being upset by Baldwin last Thursday, and showed no signs of being discouraged.

‘They’re realists,’ Kalp said. ‘They realize the next time the play poorly, it’s the last time in this uniform. We’re at the end of the road now, and we can’t afford to have another bad game.’

Hempfield plays Meadville on Thursday with the site and time for the game to be determined.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.