ShareThis Page
Hempfield seeks review of health care with teachers |

Hempfield seeks review of health care with teachers

| Tuesday, June 24, 2008 12:00 a.m

Hempfield Area school directors want to meet with the district’s teachers union this summer to review a health care proposal the board president thinks could save the district hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Teachers say they are skeptical of the proposal — which wouldn’t immediately change their benefits — because they maintain it will cost Hempfield more in the long run.

The proposed implementation of a high-deductible plan with a health reimbursement agreement, or HRA, is one of the main topics the school board and teacher representatives might discuss.

Board President John Henry is suggesting the meeting as a means to try to get both sides to work together.

Relations have been strained in the past two years, as a divided board approved a five-year labor contract last year and curriculum restructuring approved this year eliminated 15 administrative and teaching positions.

As the board prepared last week to pass a 2008-09 budget that raised taxes by 1.7 mills, Henry said Hempfield might be able to cut costs by switching to an HRA that would pay an employee’s deductibles and qualified medical expenses that don’t count toward the deductible.

Under this arrangement, the district’s provider, Highmark, would credit 16 percent of Hempfield’s $7.67 million health plan premium into an account for those expenses.

Because utilization historically has been between 40 percent and 60 percent, Henry said, the district could save some money because the unused credits carry over into the following year.

The district’s consultant has projected that 40 percent utilization of the estimated $1.26 million fund would save $727,965, while 60 percent utilization could mean a savings of $476,165.

“Even if we go 80 percent, we still save $200,000,” Henry said. “It’s a no-brainer.”

But Hempfield teachers sought an opinion last spring from a researcher for the Pennsylvania State Education Association, who insists Highmark would impose “massive increases in future premiums” after a one-time savings from the HRA implementation.

Besides, the switch to an HRA comes with a $32,225 fee for the administration of the same benefits teachers already receive, according to a PSEA memo.

Joe Scheuermann, president of the Hempfield Area Education Association, said teachers don’t want to see the district socked by a huge premium increase.

“If you can save $600,000 and give us the same health care, God bless you, but where is the savings coming from?” he said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.