ShareThis Page
Hempfield volleyball team happy with start |

Hempfield volleyball team happy with start

| Sunday, April 9, 2006 12:00 a.m

Hempfield moved into the Pennsylvania Volleyball Coaches’ Association top-20 rankings with a victory against Norwin during a preseason tournament.

Later, Hempfield solidified its position with a five-set victory against Norwin in the Section 5 opener.

That doesn’t mean Hempfield places a lot of importance in early-season success.

“All you have to do is look at the NCAA (basketball) Tournament, how there were no No. 1s in the Final Four,” Hempfield coach John Howell said. “We want to be recognized, but we don’t want to be in the top-10, because we’ll have a target on our back every night, and everyone will want to come in and take you down.”

Hempfield (3-0, 1-0) has only itself to blame for the bull’s-eye firmly planted on its uniforms.

The Spartans have come out of the gate with a vengeance, going from unranked to 14th on the strength of a pair of wins over No. 4 Norwin. In both games, a solid service game and strong play at the net were at the root of the victories.

Not that anyone is ready to concede a championship plaque to Hempfield only one game into the regular season.

“I think this section, from top to bottom, has some very good volleyball,” Norwin coach Al Warden said. “Everybody knew what we had, but I think people are a little bit surprised that Hempfield was as good as they were.

“But we saw them over the winter when a bunch of the guys got together. So, we knew what Hempfield had.”

Even without impromptu scrimmages and their meeting in the preseason tournament, Norwin had a good idea of the caliber of Hempfield’s team. It was Norwin that ended Hempfield’s shot at a 2005 WPIAL title with a 3-0 victory in the semifinals.

Despite both teams’ success in the WPIAL and PIAA tournaments last year, neither coach believes Section 5 gets its due.

“I think it’s about time we got a little respect,” Howell said. “I think, last year, we had a quality team and wasn’t recognized at all, and it was hard to see that. But I think the teams in our section make us better every night.”

Hempfield went into the WPIAL playoffs last season as the third-place team from Section 5, behind Norwin and Derry. Its 7-5 overall record wasn’t enough to garner attention, and Hempfield was forced into a play-in game against Keystone Oaks to get into the bracket.

“It’s weird, but I don’t think Westmoreland County gets enough credit,” Warden said. “Derry was a powerhouse for a bunch of years, and we’ve had a few good years. And Hempfield was in the final four of the WPIAL last year, but sometimes, I don’t think that they think we play as well.”

Part of the reason is simple geography. Of the 39 schools that field boys volleyball teams, only five are from Westmoreland County, and all are in the same section. Without geographic diversity, the teams have to be content with beating each other until the occasional weekend tournament that includes some of the better teams from the region.

“I just think there are so many good teams from Allegheny County that they kind of ignore us sometimes, because I don’t think they get to see us as often as they get to see some other teams,” Warden said. “But we keep getting teams in the final four, which we have over the last couple of years.”

Section 5 might be one reason for that.

“On the whole, that’s what makes these teams better for the WPIAL,” Howell said. “It’s such a tough section night after night after night, and you’ve got to play so hard.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.