ShareThis Page
High grass: Same problem, different approach |

High grass: Same problem, different approach

| Thursday, October 6, 2011 12:00 p.m

Grass cutting to come with a bill in Baldwin Borough

Property owners with overgrown grass in Baldwin Borough are going to be asked to pay for grass-cutting provided by the municipality.

The borough will send bills when the work is done, rather than pursuing liens, said Manager John Barrett.

Tending overgrown properties costs the borough about $35,000 a year, he said. In 2010, a borough contractor cut grass on 24 properties.

“Even if we only collect 10 percent or 5 percent of this, it’s better than we’re doing now,” Barrett said.

Pleasant Hills Council OKs rules on high grass

Borough council has approved an amendment to an ordinance that would fine property owners $500 for failure to keep their grass cut.

The borough has received complaints about high lawns of vacant houses — those being sold and those in foreclosure.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.