High school hockey spotlight: Jake Pilewicz |

High school hockey spotlight: Jake Pilewicz

Jake Pilewicz, soph., D, Quaker Valley

Historically one of the best Class A program’s in the PIHL, Quaker Valley is off to a 3-1 start this season and trails only unbeaten Mars in Section 2. The Quakers have outscored their past two opponents, 21-5, and a big part of that offense comes from a defenseman, Pilewicz. One of the team’s best all-around players, he’s among Class A’s scoring leaders with 13 points (3 goals, 10 assists). Pilewicz is also a member of the Pittsburgh Viper Stars 16-U AAA team.

Q: Quaker Valley went to three straight Penguins Cup finals from 2006-08. What will it take to get back to those heights?

A: “Those teams were very talented teams. We’re a good team, but we have some tough competition ahead. We just have to keep out-practicing teams, and we have to outsmart the other teams.”

Q: What skills are needed to be a good offensive defenseman?

A: “You need to know when it’s right to pinch, when it’s safe to pinch. You need have good timing, have your head up looking for players, and if you have the puck on the point, you need to shoot. You can’t score if you don’t shoot.”

Q: Quaker Valley faces neighboring rival Sewickley Academy tonight. Just how deep does that rivalry go?

A: “I love playing Sewickley Academy. Last year, we knocked them out of the playoffs, and I scored the winning goal. It was one of my favorite moments of my hockey career.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.