ShareThis Page
High school hockey spotlight: Tyler Stepke |

High school hockey spotlight: Tyler Stepke

Dan Stefano
| Sunday, October 24, 2010 12:00 a.m

Tyler Stepke, sr., G (Mars)

One of the top goaltenders in the PIHL, Stepke led Class A last season with a 0.924 save percentage and also ranked high with a 1.27 goals-against average. With those kinds of numbers, the senior has been one of the key pieces in Mars’ back-to-back Penguins Cup championships. He helped the Planets get off to a strong start in their quest for a three-peat by posting a shutout in last week’s season opener — 7-0 win against Central Valley. This weekend, he’s in San Jose with the Pittsburgh Viper Stars 18-under AAA team for a North American Prospects Hockey League showcase.

Your team won the St. Margaret’s preseason tournament, defeating some top teams from outside of Class A. What kind of boost does that give you entering the season?

“We know we’re comparable to the best teams in Western Pa. Because of that, we should be able to compete in every game we play this season. We had some players missing, too, so we know we can still beat team if they’re not there.”

What skills to you need to be a top goaltender?

“You’ve got to stay focused. Some games, I’ll see five shots, six shots, and they don’t come at once. It can get boring, but I’ve got to stay focused.”

Are there any goaltenders you look up to in the NHL?

“I like (Chicago goaltender) Marty Turco because he can play the puck so well. He’s like a third defenseman back there. He doesn’t conform to the goaltenders in the NHL right now.”

Is it tough having the bull’s-eye on you every night, knowing that everyone wants to beat the champs?

“I know the bull’s-eye is pretty big. Last year, Knoch beat us, and I haven’t forgotten about it since. We can’t have any off nights. It’s fun that we’re the team to beat, but it’s tough having that pressure.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.