ShareThis Page
High school hockey spotlight: Zach Milnarcik |

High school hockey spotlight: Zach Milnarcik

| Sunday, November 7, 2010 12:00 a.m

Montour has gotten off to one of the better starts in Class AA this season, thanks in no small part to the play of Zach Milnarcik, the Spartans’ leading scorer. Before Friday’s matchup at Franklin Regional, the senior center had scored 12 points (8g, 4a) to help the Spartans to a 2-0-1 record in the early going. Two of his goals came in a 2-2 tie against Latrobe, the three-time defending Penguins Cup champ. Milnarcik also plays amateur hockey for the Pittsburgh Wildcats’ 18-U AA team.

Q: After leading the Spartans in goals last year, you’re on an even faster scoring pace now. What parts of your game have improved in the offseason?

A: “I’ve definitely gotten stronger, and I shoot a lot. My dad makes me practice shooting, and I’ve definitely gotten faster than other kids.”

Q: With teams like Latrobe, West Allegheny and Peters Township grabbing much of the attention in Class AA, do you feel like Montour tends to fly under the radar?

A: “Definitely. That’s what our coaches told us at the beginning of the season. We’re not even a team that is looked at being in championship contention. We kind of thrive off of being the underdog.”

Q: What does tying a team like Latrobe this early in the season do for your squad’s confidence?

A: “That was an awesome game. It showed a lot from our team, and it definitely boosted our confidence. I actually thought we could have beaten them.”

Q: What is the most-memorable game you’ve played in?

A: “In my sophomore year, we beat Bishop Canevin in the semifinals of the Penguins Cup. We won, 3-1, and I had a breakaway goal to make it 2-1.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.