ShareThis Page
Highlands battles, but comes up short |

Highlands battles, but comes up short

| Saturday, October 10, 2009 12:00 a.m

Highlands fought the good fight in the first half against Indiana High School at Andy Kuzneski Field Friday night, but still fell short, dropping a 21-7 decision to the Indians.

That means the Golden Rams remain winless on the season. Still, Highlands head coach Sam Albert was content with his team’s performance.

“We are trying to build on positives,” Albert said. “I was real pleased tonight with some of our execution.”

Highlands tailback Greg Negley carried the ball 30 times for 159 yards, averaging 5.3 yards per carry, and scored the only Golden Ram touchdown of the night.

“Gary always runs hard,” Coach Albert said. “I thought the offensive line did a good job.”

The Indians scored first, on an 82-yard pass to Vincent Gatti in the first quarter. The Golden Rams came right back with a 68-yard, 11-play drive that broke their 10-quarter scoreless streak. Negley pounded his way through three defensemen and into the end zone on a 4-yard carry to start the second quarter.

The Highlands defense held Indiana to just 3 rushing yards in the first half, but gave up 160 passing yards.

Indiana seized the momentum for good, though, on one-play, 69-yard touchdown pass, then put constant pressure on Highlands throughout the second half.

Highlands twice thwarted Indiana drives in the third quarter by causing turnovers in the red zone, but the Golden Ram offense couldn’t score. Negley, who rushed for 129 yards on 21 carries in the first half, had only 30 yards on nine carries in the second half.

“We competed against a well-coached team,” Albert said. “I thought our defense did an outstanding job.”

Highlands next plays at Franklin Regional.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.