ShareThis Page
Highlands gets second shot at Knoch |

Highlands gets second shot at Knoch

| Monday, November 5, 2007 12:00 a.m

Football coaches like to live in the present. To them, there is no next week.

Mike King of Knoch and Sam Albert of Highlands had to deviate from that thinking when the WPIAL playoff pairings were released a week ago at the Embassy Suites Hotel in Moon.

How could the coaches, and good friends, not take a peek at the second round of the Class AAA playoff bracket•

The possibility of a rematch of their Week 9 Greater Alllegheny Conference showdown loomed large. The scenario was simple. Should the teams post first-round wins, they would get a curtain call.

“Honestly, I thought it was a distinct possibility that we would see them again,” King said. “I didn’t think it would be this quick. But here it is.”

The possibility became reality two nights ago when Knoch and Highlands raced into the quarterfinals with playoff-opening victories, setting the stage for a second meeting — this one with much more at stake than a conference title.

Knoch (8-2), the No. 3 seed in Class AAA, will take on No. 11 Highlands (8-2).

Sites and times for the quarterfinals will be announced at noon today.

Knoch, like it has all season, rode tailback Tim McNerney to a 42-24 win over New Castle, while Highlands rallied late to get past Blackhawk, 21-19.

McNerney rushed for 297 yards and four touchdowns, moving him over the 1,600-yard mark for the season. Highlands junior quarterback Jeff Sinclair led a late scoring drive and capped it with a 1-yard touchdown run, as the Golden Rams came back from a 19-15 deficit with four minutes to play.

Knoch won easily the last time the teams met on Oct. 26 at Knoch. The Knights passed for 120 yards and ran for over 200 in a 41-13 win.

“Any time you play a game like we played last time, you’d like another opportunity,” Albert said. “I sure hope it’s better the second time.”

Three other local teams also opened the playoffs on a high note and will play second-round games later this week.

&#149 Ford City rolled to a 41-14 win over Laurel and will make its bid for a third straight spot in the Class AA semifinals. The No. 2-seeded Sabers (10-0) will play No. 7 Riverside (9-1).

“Riverside is a big, strong team,” Laurel coach Jerry Holzhauser said. “They’ll have to prepare for Ford City’s speed and all the diversity they have in their offense. I think it will be a good game.”

&#149 Springdale (8-1) shook off a slow start with two third-quarter touchdowns to defeat Chartiers-Houston, 21-0, in the first round of the Class A playoffs. Senior Nathan Zurisko accounted for all three scores as he threw for two touchdowns and ran for another.

“It was great to play at home in front of our fans,” Springdale coach Chuck Wagner said. “They are very loyal. They are the Dynamos. Hopefully, we can keep going.”

The Dynamos will face Western Beaver (9-1).

&#149 Apollo-Ridge (6-4) advanced to the quarterfinals for the first time in school history with a 38-14 win over Jefferson-Morgan. Now, the challenge gets tougher. The Vikings will take on Class A No. 2 seed Serra Catholic (10-0).

“We just got to go out there and do the best we can,” Apollo-Ridge junior running back Derek Bandurak said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.