Highlands overpowered by TJ |

Highlands overpowered by TJ

In the final two games of the regular season, Thomas Jefferson coach Bill Cherpak’s team struggled to find consistency.

For the past 16 years under Cherpak, there has been nothing like the first round of the WPIAL Class AAA playoffs to get back on track.

The Jaguars got their postseason started right Friday night, posting a 42-7 victory over visiting Highlands. In their past 11 first-round games, the Jaguars have outscored the competition, 545-74.

“Our last two games were kind of sloppy,” said Cherpak, who has not lost a first-round playoff game at TJ. “I thought we did a good job. We didn’t turn the ball over today and made some plays.”

With the victory, TJ advanced to face 10th-seeded Hopewell in the quarterfinals next week.

After struggling to earn victories against Belle Vernon and West Mifflin to close the regular season, the second-seeded Jaguars (9-1) dominated against an overmatched No. 15 seed from Highlands (5-5).

Running back Ryan Ruffing rambled for 109 rushing yards and two touchdowns on only 11 carries; fellow tailback T.J. Matrascia managed 66 yards. Junior quarterback Dom Presto completed 4 of 9 passes for 79 yards and two touchdowns.

Ruffing and Matrascia also found paydirt on defense. Matrascia scored on a 63-yard interception return in the first quarter, and Ruffing added a 33-yard interception return for a touchdown in the second.

Highlands managed only 156 yards of total offense. Quarterback Seth Goheen took the brunt of the Jaguars’ aggression, completing 5 of 14 passes for 55 yards, a touchdown and three interceptions. Terrell Leonard led the Golden Rams’ rushing attack with 59 yards on five carries.

“Turnovers hurt us,” Highlands coach Sam Albert said. “I’m proud of our kids. They give you everything they have, but we were a little outmanned in certain positions.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.