ShareThis Page
Highmark: Can’t be sole lifeline |

Highmark: Can’t be sole lifeline

| Tuesday, September 26, 2006 12:00 a.m

Despite giving substantial loans to prop up hospitals in the past, Highmark Inc. said Monday it could not help Mercy Hospital because it cannot be the only source of assistance for troubled health care institutions.

“We feel that we cannot be the sole party or stakeholder in health care for helping these institutions,” said Highmark spokesman Michael Weinstein. “We’re willing to do our part but we feel it’s a shared community responsibility.”

Mercy, which lost $42 million in the last three years, announced last week it is merging with University of Pittsburgh Medical Center after approaching several other potential partners, including Highmark.

Mercy spokeswoman Linda K. Ross said Highmark responded to Mercy’s request for help but the health insurer offered only minimal assistance with the cost of providing care to the poor and underserved.

“Given the scope of our needs, the amount they were able to make available wasn’t enough,” Ross said. “We were grateful for what they could provide.”

Neither Mercy nor Highmark would say how much Highmark was willing to invest.

Highmark has been generous in the past. In 2000, it loaned West Penn Allegheny Health System $125 million to start the six-hospital network that rose after the collapse of the Allegheny Health Education and Research Foundation. Most recently, Highmark offered Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh $163 million to help build its pediatric hospital in Lawrenceville.

Weinstein said Highmark can only help so much because the health insurer — which had a surplus of about $2.8 billion in 2005 — is facing financial challenges of its own.

For instance, he said Highmark is spending hundreds of millions of dollars in technology improvements and upgrading systems so that it can pay claims faster.

He would not specify the cost of those upgrades nor other expenses made to implement the Medicare prescription drug program known as Part D.

“We have to be very prudent and judicious in our investments,” Weinstein said.

It is too early to know if the UPMC-Mercy merger will have any impact on contract negotiations between Highmark and UPMC. Their contracts, which spell out reimbursement rates, are not due to expire for at least six years.

UPMC officials have said they suspect Mercy’s contracts with Highmark pay Mercy more than what they pay UPMC hospitals. That means Highmark could stand to benefit from the merger because Mercy would likely be reimbursed less — at the same rates as other UPMC hospitals.

Mercy’s contracts with Highmark are not up for renewal for another three years, Weinstein said.

Highmark, which in the past raised concerns about UPMC’s dominance of the market, believes the UPMC-Mercy does not stifle competition even though it leaves only two dominant hospital networks.

“This agreement preserves choice,” Weinstein said. “It’s leaving a faith-based system that might have been lost.”

That’s not the opinion of UPMC rival West Penn Allegheny Health System, which last week called UPMC’s tactics monopolistic.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.