ShareThis Page
Hill developers says grocery remains in works |

Hill developers says grocery remains in works

Bob Bauder
| Thursday, April 19, 2012 12:00 a.m

Leadership changes, cost estimate errors and a funding shortfall are the latest obstacles delaying construction of a long-awaited grocery store in the Hill District, officials said on Wednesday.

The Hill House Association, a community nonprofit developing the property across from its Centre Avenue headquarters, had said crews would complete work on an $8.5 million Shop ‘n Save supermarket and adjoining retail plaza last year. Now the opening date is uncertain.

Cheryl Hall-Russell, who became the organization’s president and CEO in September, said project estimates are closer to $9 million. She cited inaccurate estimates for store equipment, such as freezers, but would not disclose the amount Hill House needs.

“The clear message is we’re going to have a store,” she said. “The funders are still on board and … I’m very confident that this will happen.”

Hill House received financial pledges from government agencies and private donors, including $3.2 million from the state, Allegheny County and Pittsburgh Urban Redevelopment Authority; $1 million from the Pittsburgh Penguins; $1 million from Philadelphia-based The Reinvestment Fund; and $525,000 from the Richard King Mellon Foundation, officials said.

The URA donated property worth $500,000. Dollar Bank is lending $1.5 million.

The project involves a supermarket to be operated by Jeff Ross, who owns four Shop ‘n Save stores, and additional retail space. Ross, who did not return phone calls, is contributing $1 million and will lease the property.

Mayor Luke Ravenstahl said he directed the URA to help get the project back on track. Robert Rubinstein, the URA’s acting director, said the agency is involved but referred questions to Hill House.

“It’s taken a little bit longer than we would like at this point but we’re 100-percent committed to getting it done,” Ravenstahl said.

One major delay was the firing in February of Hill House Executive Director Julie C. Matthews, 39, and the subsequent resignation of her husband, Jason Matthews, who was project manager, Hall-Russell said. Julie Matthews filed a lawsuit alleging she was fired because she told Hill House management that project money was mishandled.

Hill House denied the claims and Hall-Russell said an independent auditor found nothing amiss. She said she asked for the review before Matthews sued, to make sure finances were in order.

“I’m glad we did it now,” she said. “It was important for me to be able to go to our funders and say monies have been used exactly the way they should have.”

Workers cleared the property at Centre Avenue and Heldman Street, Hall-Russell said. Hill House is seeking bids for a general contractor. Hall-Russell would not say how much money the group has spent.

Councilman Daniel Lavelle and state Rep. Jake Wheatley Jr., D-Hill District, said neighbors are frustrated that the long-promised store is not open but delays are common with large projects. Lavelle said the store could open in 2013.

“I think there were just some things that we could have done better,” Hall-Russell said, without specifying.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, or via Twitter .

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.