‘Hillarious’ machinations |

‘Hillarious’ machinations

Sen. Hillary Clinton may have a better option than running for president in 2004.

She could run as the vice presidential candidate with whomever the Democrats pick as the presidential candidate. She would not break her promise not to run for president in 2004.

Given the light duties of the vice president, she could be both senator and vice president, thus keeping her promise to serve her full Senate term. She would get national exposure as a candidate, not just as first lady.

If “whomever” loses, she would not be blamed. Whether “whomever” wins or loses, she would be heir apparent.

If Wesley Clark is a stalking horse for anyone, the likely person is Al Gore. He won the popular vote in 2000. He could unite the Democrats, particularly with Bill’s help.

Gore-Clinton in 2004?

Richard Corwin Bethel Park

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.