ShareThis Page
History center to hold onto disputed Brashear time capsule for now |

History center to hold onto disputed Brashear time capsule for now

Chris Ramirez
| Wednesday, April 1, 2015 6:29 p.m
Image courtesy of Al Paslow
This notice dated Aug. 14, 1894, on the personal letterhead of John A. Brashear, Astronomical & Physical Instrument Works, Allegheny, PA., USA, was found in the papers of the time capsule.
Andrew Russell | Trib Total Media
Jadell Minniefield, owner and operator of Jadell Minniefield Construction Services Inc., packs up a truck with debris from the John A. Brashear Factory in the North Side on Tuesday, March 17, 2015. Part of the historic brick building collapsed Monday evening.
Image courtesy of Al Paslow
This is a picture of the employees of John A. Brashear's mechanical department dated August 1894. On Tuesday, Al Paslow was inspecting the remains of the Brashear Factory when a member of the demolition crew said he found a time capsule in the cornerstone of the building a few days ago.
Image courtesy of Al Paslow
Resting atop an August 1894 Sunday paper is a piece of glass with an inscription that reads 'One of the first pieces of optical glass Made in America.' A metal box of items was found in the corner stone of the John Brashear factory while it was being demolished.
Image courtesy of Al Paslow
A letter dated July 31, 1894, from Warner & Swasey congratulating Brashear on his new factory.
Image courtesy of Al Paslow
An image of John Brashear's father, Basil Brown Brashear, found inside the time capsule.

The Heinz History Center is keeping watch over the contents of a time capsule discovered at the John A. Brashear factory as Pittsburgh and a Hazelwood contractor argue in court over ownership.

Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael A. Della Vecchia on Wednesday granted the city an emergency injunction ordering Jadell Minniefield Construction Services Inc. to turn the material over to the history center.

Pittsburgh owned the derelict building and agreed to pay the company $235,000 to raze it after a wall collapsed March 16 onto an adjacent building. Jadell Minniefield argued in court documents that its contract with the city granted it “salvage rights” to the capsule and that the city is attempting to “financially bully” it by withholding payment for the demolition.

“That belongs to the people of Pittsburgh,” Mayor Bill Peduto said. “John Brashear was recognized nationally and internationally and is part of Pittsburgh’s history.”

Neither Jadell Minniefield nor its attorney returned phone calls.

Brashear is recognized as a world-renowned scientist and philanthropist. He made mirrors and lenses for telescopes at the factory, which along with his adjacent house are listed on the National Register of Historic Places, until his death in 1920. His ashes are interred with his wife’s in Allegheny Observatory, which he directed and helped found.

The capsule discovered inside a cornerstone included a photograph of factory workers and documents dating to 1894, a lock of Brashear’s wife Phoebe’s hair and what was inscribed as one of the first pieces of optical glass made in America.

Peduto said the city would immediately cede ownership to the history center if it wins the court case.

History Center President and CEO Andy Masich said conservators have photographed all of the materials and are keeping them in climate-controlled archives.

“If the materials came to the history center, we would reunite them with the rest of the Brashear collection,” he said.

Pittsburgh went to court after Jadell Minniefield opened the time capsule at the demolition site along Perrysville Avenue, arguing the company likely damaged the contents and had no right to take them.

The company said in court documents that it handled the material with “all due care” and caused no damage.

Bob Bauder is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-765-2312 or

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.