ShareThis Page
Hlinka’s lawyers claim discrimination |

Hlinka’s lawyers claim discrimination

| Sunday, February 17, 2002 12:00 a.m

SALT LAKE CITY – Ivan Hlinka still can’t figure out why the Penguins fired him, but his lawyers think they have a pretty good idea.

On Hlinka’s behalf, they have filed a national origin discrimination claim with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

The claim asserts that Hlinka, from the Czech Republic, was fired as Penguins coach on account of his national origin.

“We believe that coach Hlinka was fired because of the fact that the team no longer needed a Czech coach, because it no longer had a Czech superstar,” said Hlinka’s attorney, Mike Florio, of Clarksburg, W. Va.

Florio was referring to former Penguins star Jaromir Jagr, who was traded to the Washington Capitals last summer. The Penguins fired Hlinka on Oct. 15 of this season, after the team started 0-4.

The sides already are embroiled in a lawsuit. Hlinka filed suit against the team in December, claiming breach of contract. He has not been paid since the Penguins fired him. At the time, he was owed $854,000 on a three-year contract that expires June 30, 2003.

He wants the Penguins to pay him the money owed so far – more than $100,000 – and to resume his normal payment schedule until the contract expires. Hlinka also wants damages of 25 percent of all unpaid wages through the trial date, plus attorney’s fees and interest.

If Hlinka’s EEOC claim is upheld, the Penguins could sustain punitive damages, Florio said.

The Penguins, who have five Czech players on their roster and several more in their system, had no comment Saturday.

Hlinka is in Salt Lake City, working as the general manager of the Czech Olympic team. He wonders if the Penguins expected him to go away quietly without his money.

“Hopefully, they don’t think I’m that stupid,” Hlinka said.

He added that neither general manager Craig Patrick nor owner Mario Lemieux has spoken with him since the day he was fired. “They think of me like I am a zero,” Hlinka said. “They don’t need to talk to me anymore. That’s not fair.”

Hlinka finished his 86-game Penguins career with a record of 42-32-9-3. The Czechs play Lemieux and Team Canada on Monday afternoon.

“I cannot say I did a great job,” Hlinka said. “But I did something over there.”

The Penguins are expected to argue in court that Hlinka violated the terms of his contract by not taking English classes last summer at home in the Czech Republic. A clause in his contract states that he ‘must follow any reasonable instructions given him by the team.’ The Penguins have maintained that Hlinka was told to improve his English, preferably by way of formal lessons. Hlinka says the Penguins never made such an order and that no such demand was written into his contract.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.