Honor veterans & God |

Honor veterans & God

As we approach Veterans Day, we should remember that a veteran is someone who wrote a blank check made payable to the United States of America for any amount up to and including his or her life.

That is honor. But there are too many people in our country who no longer understand that.

Many years ago, I attended the Harwick public schools. On Nov. 11, at 11 a.m., students would rise for a minute of silence and then the teacher would read a short prayer to honor those who died in World War I.

This could never happen today because the U.S. Supreme Court — at the behest of the American Civil Liberties Union — has banned prayer in public schools.

Our country was founded on Judeo-Christian principles, yet we can’t pray in our public schools. That’s ludicrous.

Also, regarding the Oct. 14 article “Shift at Vatican ‘seismic’” : The news media jumped the gun and expected the synod of Catholic clergy to accept homosexual marriage. Once again, they were wrong. The truth is no religious organization, nor president, nor Supreme Court has the power to suppress God’s law, which will prevail long after these mortals are dead and turned to dust.

Isaiah 5:20 warns, “Woe be to those who call evil good and good evil.” In a morally bankrupt America, we are fast approaching the level of sin that saturated Sodom prior to its destruction by God.

There’s a list in I Corinthians of the many who will not inherit the kingdom of God unless they repent and are forgiven by Jesus. One doesn’t repent by marching in parades celebrating sin or bragging about abortion.

Rudy Gagliardi


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.