Archive

ShareThis Page
Hood, Eason fight nagging injuries | TribLIVE.com
News

Hood, Eason fight nagging injuries

Tribune-Review
| Thursday, October 21, 2010 12:00 a.m

Defensive end Ziggy Hood hasn’t lived up to expectations of his No. 1 draft status from 2009 to the point where he can’t get on the field ahead of journeyman defensive end Nick Eason. One reason is Hood has been hampered by an ankle injury for a large portion of the regular season. “I got a little nicked up, and it took away from my speed,” Hood said. “That’s what I bring to the table, but it’s getting back to where I need it to be. And I’m getting ready to play.” With defensive end Brett Keisel already ruled out of Sunday’s game in Miami, Eason or Hood will start at right end. Eason also is hurting from knee and ankle injuries he suffered during last week’s game. “It is nothing severe or a situation where I am going to miss any games,” Eason said.

• Trai Essex said his injured ankle that kept him out of the past three games is good enough for him to get back on the field Sunday against Miami. In fact, Essex said he is absolutely going to play against the Dolphins. “I am about 85-90 percent healthy,” Essex said. The question remains that if Essex will regain his starting right guard spot that has been filled by Doug Legursky.

• The Steelers have yet to wear their road white jerseys and that will continue this week. The Dolphins have selected to wear their white jerseys at home, forcing the Steelers to wear their black home shirts in temperatures expected to be in the mid 80s at kickoff. The Steelers will wear their white jerseys for the first time Halloween night in New Orleans.

• Keisel (hamstring) and James Harrison (personal) missed practice, and Essex was limited. For the Dolphins, running back Lousaka Polite (knee) missed practice, and defensive end Jared Odrick (ankle) was limited.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.