Archive

ShareThis Page
House committee chairman Issa wants more Fast and Furious documents from Justice Department | TribLIVE.com
News

House committee chairman Issa wants more Fast and Furious documents from Justice Department

Tribune-Review
| Friday, November 7, 2014 12:01 a.m

WASHINGTON — House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., said the Justice Department released 64,280 pages of documents Monday night related to Fast and Furious, the botched Phoenix-based gun-tracking operation, but he wanted much more.

The operation targeted Mexican gun traffickers, but two rifles involved were linked to the killing of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry.

Justice Department spokesman Brian Fallon said in a statement: “There is nothing in the materials produced today that contradicts what the Department has said in the past about this flawed operation. Indeed the materials produced today affirm the Inspector General’s finding that the Attorney General was not made aware of the tactics involved in the Fast and Furious operation until February 2011.”

But a statement from Issa’s panel said the documents showed that “the President and the Attorney General attempted to extend the scope of the Executive Privilege well beyond its historical boundaries to avoid disclosing documents that embarrass or otherwise implicate senior Obama Administration officials.”

How embarrassing are they?

Some highlights: In one April 2011 email, as the investigation was heating up, Attorney General Eric Holder wrote to senior officials: “Issa and his idiot cronies never gave a damn about this when all that was happening was that thousands of Mexicans were being killed with guns from our country. All they want to do — in reality — is cripple ATF (the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives) and suck up to the gun lobby. Politics at its worst — maybe the media will get it.”

Holder has always claimed that he didn’t know about the tactics used in the operation until February 2011. On Feb. 23, after he was alerted to a CBS News story that had just broken, Holder sent an email at 5:27 p.m. to senior Justice officials saying: “Ok. We need answers on this, not defensive bs — real answers.”

In October 2011, as the controversy was building and Issa was demanding more documents, senior White House adviser Valerie Jarrett wrote Holder with a “Fast and Furious” subject line. “I’m sorry,” she wrote.

“Time to go to the mattresses,” Holder responded. “Ready for the fight. Will send some of our stuff. All I have are the facts.”

Three minutes later, Jarrett wrote: “Facts always work.”

Issa is hardly satisfied with the latest batch of emails.

“When Eric Holder wants to know why he was the first Attorney General held in criminal contempt of Congress, he can read the judge’s order that compelled the production of 64,280 pages that he and President Obama illegitimately and illegally withheld from Congress,” Issa said in the committee statement.

“Since these pages still do not represent the entire universe of the documents the House of Representatives is seeking related to the Justice Department’s cover-up of the botched gun-walking scandal that contributed to the death of a Border Patrol agent, our court case will continue.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.