House committee to convene Pittsburgh hearing on Legionnaires outbreak at VA hospitals |

House committee to convene Pittsburgh hearing on Legionnaires outbreak at VA hospitals

Stymied by delays and frustrated by what they call a lack of accountability, federal lawmakers plan to bring their investigation of Veterans Affairs hospitals into the VA Pittsburgh’s backyard.

The House Committee on Veterans Affairs is scheduled to convene a hearing on Sept. 9 in Pittsburgh about infectious disease outbreaks in VA hospitals across the country and the tens of thousands of dollars in performance bonuses given to leaders of those hospitals.

The hearing is slated to begin at 9 a.m. in the Allegheny County Courthouse, Downtown, across the Allegheny River from the North Shore office of VA Regional Director Michael Moreland. Moreland, former head of the VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, received a $63,000 bonus shortly before the VA Pittsburgh disclosed a Legionnaires’ disease outbreak linked to at least 21 illnesses and five deaths.

“Other than management at the VA, we have not heard or read of one person who believes that the (VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System) management is capable of performing the most basic tasks assigned to any hospital employee — public, private or government-operated — protecting and caring for our veterans,” said Judy Nicklas, daughter-in-law of William Nicklas, an 87-year-old Navy veteran who died Nov. 23 of Legionnaires contracted at the Oakland VA hospital. His family sued the VA on Friday.

VA Committee Chairman Jeff Miller, R-Fla., has criticized VA leaders for failing to provide records Congress requested and for failing to hold anyone to account for the fatal outbreak, despite several VA Inspector General reports citing management failures.

“VA takes seriously issues that occur at any of our individual facilities, and we will continue to work collaboratively with Congress and other stakeholders to conduct oversight of our operations in support of our mission of serving Veterans and their families,” VA spokeswoman Ndidi Mojay said in an email to the Trib.

The hearing likely will include testimony from veterans, family members and VA executives responsible for facilities in Pittsburgh, Atlanta, Dallas, Buffalo and Jackson, Miss.

Investigations suggest mistakes in those facilities exposed patients to infectious diseases. In several cases, including Pittsburgh, those in charge received large bonuses despite the mistakes.

“The purpose of this hearing is to examine whether the VA has the proper management and accountability structures in place to stop the emerging pattern of preventable veteran deaths and serious patient-safety issues at VA medical centers across the country,” according to an announcement released on Monday by committee spokesman Curt Cashour.

Federal public health investigators who looked into the Legionnaires’ outbreak in VA hospitals in Oakland and O’Hara linked it to 21 illnesses from February 2011 to November 2012. A Tribune-Review investigation revealed that elevated levels of Legionella, the bacteria that causes Legionnaires, was found in the hospital’s water at least as far back as 2007, and a sixth family claims their loved one contracted the deadly form of pneumonia in the veterans hospital and then died.

“It seems like the VA hasn’t been transparent, and I think the veteran community has that interpretation,” said Ron Conley, director of veterans services for Allegheny County. “Hopefully, this hearing will restore that confidence to the VA.”

Mike Wereschagin and Adam Smeltz are staff writers for Trib Total Media. Wereschagin can be reached at 412-320-7900 or [email protected]. Smeltz can be reached at 412-380-5676 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.