ShareThis Page
House OKs commission to examine school spending |

House OKs commission to examine school spending

Megan Harris
| Wednesday, January 15, 2014 11:39 p.m

A school funding bill passed the state House on Wednesday, despite ongoing partisan debate over whether a funding formula even exists.

Widely supported by school administrators, teachers unions and advocacy groups, House Bill 1738 would establish a commission to study and recommend a more equitable way to distribute state dollars to districts. The commission would be comprised of House and Senate majority and minority leaders; Department of Education representatives; and a gubernatorial appointee.

A 2013 Education Law Center report said that Pennsylvania, Delaware and North Carolina are the only states without education funding formulas.

“Saying we don’t have a funding formula is a little too general,” House Republican spokesman Michael Stoll wrote in an email. “Critics would be more precise if they say they don’t like the current funding formula.”

The state phased in “hold harmless” provisions when recession-era cuts largely nulled a formula passed in 2008. Provisions ensure that districts in flux can’t lose funding by renewing the previous year’s budget, but weren’t designed for long-term use.

Pennsylvania’s $5.5 billion education budget includes several funding supplements, which target districts on criteria ranging from innovative curricula to large populations of minority students.

Detractors argue that inconsistent cash supplements aren’t equitable and are based on antiquated student data collected in a state-sponsored study from 2007. The Education Department’s website refers at least once to the 2000 Census.

“If you really want to go back, we haven’t had a fair funding formula since 1991,” said Jim Buckheit, executive director for the Pennsylvania Association of School Administrators.

The state was on the right track with the 2007 study, Buckheit said, but a $1 billion cut in surplus funding in 2010 derailed that.

“Those cuts were made proportionally, so places like Mt. Lebanon that only get 10 to 12 percent of their funding from the state didn’t lose as much. Duquesne School District probably received closer to 70 percent, so they lost a lot more.”

House Bill 1738 is a huge step forward, he said.

“As it is, districts have no idea what they’re going to get from year to year,” said Hannah Barrick, director of advocacy for the Pennsylvania Association of School Business Officials. “The first school budgets are due before (Gov. Tom Corbett) even makes his budget address.”

Commission members will be tasked with developing a formula that takes into account each school district’s market value; personal-income aid ratio; equalized millage rate; geographic price differences; enrollment levels; local support; and other factors.

Detailed recommendations are due within a year, following public hearings. Lawmakers then will decide whether to make them law.

Staff writer Brad Bumsted contributed to this report. Megan Harris is a Trib Total Media staff writer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.