House Republican floats plan to defund immigration order but avoid shutdown |

House Republican floats plan to defund immigration order but avoid shutdown

WASHINGTON — A senior House Republican on Tuesday floated a plan to avoid a government shutdown fight in December while also setting a path for undoing immigration changes President Obama is expected to execute.

Under a strategy suggested by House appropriations committee chairman Hal Rogers, Congress next month would pass a bill funding the government through September, the end of this fiscal year. That would avoid closure of the government in an ongoing battle with Obama over immigration policy.

But once Obama issues his expected order on immigration policy, Congress could pass a measure known as a “recisions” bill, cutting funding for those actions.

Obama is expected to announce steps by year’s end to allow possibly as many as 5 million undocumented residents remain in the United States without fear of deportation. The move likely would allow them to work legally, at least temporarily.

Republicans, who will control the Senate as well as the House of Representatives in the new Congress that begins in January, are weighing how to respond. Many oppose what they say would amount to an “amnesty” by the president for undocumented immigrants.

House Speaker John Boehner, asked by reporters if the recisions approach had merit, said “maybe.”

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell said he would support whatever approach the Republican-controlled House approved. He added that arguments over funding between Republicans and the White House would continue for months.

McConnell vowed just after the Nov. 4 election that there would be no more government shutdowns under a Republican-controlled Congress. But Tuesday he said it was “not unusual” for Congress to use its spending powers to demand policy changes, adding that the sides will have to work through their differences.

“It’s always appropriate to use the power of the purse, but it’s important to remember that the president has an important trump card; it’s called the veto,” McConnell said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.