ShareThis Page
House sends budget bill to Senate |

House sends budget bill to Senate

WASHINGTON — With little protest or debate, the House approved on a bipartisan 359-67 vote a huge spending bill to fund the federal government until October.

“It’s pretty remarkable for a ‘do nothing’ Congress that this enormous piece of legislation is going through the Capitol like a greased pig,” said Steve Ellis of Taxpayers for Common Sense, a government watchdog group that tracks federal spending.

The nearly 1,600-page spending bill includes all 12 of the individual annual spending bills packaged into one $1.012 trillion “omnibus” spending bill. It includes the entire breadth of the federal government’s discretionary spending outside of what it is mandated to spend on entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare.

The Senate is expected to approve the bill on Friday, sending it to President Obama for his signature before the stopgap funding expires on Saturday. The bill will have gone from introduction to law in just six days, while the normal appropriations process is structured to take months and allow for more lawmaker input.

This omnibus is even more extraordinary in that it includes all 12 of the annual spending bills. It’s the first time since at least 1989 — when legislative records are readily available — that Congress did not complete any of the individual spending bills in a fiscal year.

GOP support for the omnibus has infuriated outside fiscal conservative and Tea Party groups, who philosophically oppose legislation of that size because they contend that there is no way lawmakers could understand what’s in it.

A similar “read the bill” sentiment grew out of the contentious debate over the sweeping 2010 Affordable Care Act, which Tea Party activists recalled in voicing opposition to the omnibus.

“While Americans suffer the consequences of Obamacare, Congress is trying to rush through another massive bill before reading it,” said Jenny Beth Martin, co-founder of the Tea Party Patriots, who characterized the bill as a “monstrosity.”

Prominent conservative lawmakers — including Tea Party-aligned Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas and Rep. Tom Cotton, Arkansas Senate candidate — announced their opposition, underscoring the potential political sensitivity of voting in favor of the spending package in an election year.

Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass., holding up the thick bill on the House floor, criticized the House for voting on a bill “that nobody has read.” But he acknowledged that Congress was moving forward because without a spending bill in place, the government faces another shutdown and a return to unpopular across-the-board budget cuts known as the sequester. “The alternatives are even worse,” he said.

However, the two-year budget deal approved in December that set Congress on the course to this omnibus has given Congress the best chance in two decades to return some regular order in the budget process for next year.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.